PetSmart Employee Beats Dogs, Keeps Job
Reader Matt watched a PetSmart PetsHotel employee strike several dogs while waiting to pick up his pet. Matt immediately spoke with the store manager, who called the next day called to condemn the employee's actions as 'horribly inappropriate,' and to promise that the employee would no longer work with dogs. Ten days later, Matt received another call, this time from the District Manager.
..the District Manager called us back and stated that she watched the video in slow motion, and that while she could understand how we interpreted the employee's gestures to have been inappropriate, that she has concluded that the man was just playing with the animals, did not in fact strike any dogs, and was not inappropriate.Matt writes:
On Sunday, October 21, my wife and I picked up our dog from the Petsmart Hotel in Alexandria, Virginia (at Potomac Yards) where he had been boarded for one night. As we waited for our dog to be retrieved, we watched a live video stream of the day care room on a monitor facing us. The room appeared to be overcrowded with more than a dozen large dogs in a relatively small space. One employee could be seen in the middle of the crowd of dogs. Suddenly, both my wife and I saw this employee raise his hand and strike a dog. We were shocked by what we saw. Outraged, we immediately pointed this out the desk employee and requested to see a manager. As we waited, we continued to watch the video feed and witnessed the worker strike two or three more dogs. The Pet Hotel manager came out and we explained what we saw. We asked that this matter would be investigated and that the individual we saw strike the dogs would be removed from caring for dogs. We weren't looking for any deal from Petsmart or to threaten any legal action -- we just wanted a firm answer that this employee would no longer be left in the care of any animals.If you need to board your pet, use a local kennel instead a chain pet store.The following day we received calls from both the Pet Hotel manager as well as the store manger. The Pet Hotel manager told me personally that she watched the video and found the worker's actions "unacceptable." In a separate conversation, the store manager stated that he watched the video "about 12 times" and also found it horribly inappropriate. Next we received a call from the District Manager who was incredibly evasive in her statements and stated she would get back to us after a full investigation, but that the employee in question was still working with dogs while the investigation took place. Ten days after the incident, the District Manager called us back and stated that she watched the video in slow motion, and that while she could understand how we interpreted the employee's gestures to have been inappropriate, that she has concluded that the man was just playing with the animals, did not in fact strike any dogs, and was not inappropriate. In response, we very reasonably asked if we could watch the video with her so she could show us what she saw. She said no.
Since this incident, we have canceled all his future stays. We are outraged by what we saw and even more troubled that despite two managers having told us that they agreed that the employee was inappropriate, the district manager not only concluded otherwise, but refused to show us her interpretation. Petsmart has handled this in the worst possible way, excusing the conduct of an employee who hit dogs he was entrusted to care.
We feel the right thing to do is to let the community know about this incident so that dog owners can consider this incident when finding care for their dogs. Needless to say, we feel strongly that Petsmart Hotel is not a dependable or safe place to trust for care of D.C.-area pets.
(Photo: dairycow2)
Post a comment
Comments:
@azntg: This "we" you speak of is not one person. It's typically not even the same people. A large group of people with wildly divergant views having massive inconsistencies among views held by different people within that group is nothing to be surprised at.
Be outraged at the people who believe that beating a fellow human is acceptable, not those who believe that beating dogs is wrong, and don't ascribe the views of the former set to the latter.
Why do company's think it is better to cover up and lie about what happened, rather than just being honest and correcting the mistake. Managers are so brain washed into thinking that covering up the real problem, VS just being honest about what happened is the better way.
I bet if the district manager in this case would have just been honest about what happened and provided corrective action, this story might have not even been told to the consumerist.
Stupid, just stupid! I would have been calling animal control and turning the tape over to them for charges.....
I think these two that left the first comments are idiots. The point of this story is not how people treat other people and comments about treating humans better should not be left here. If someone chooses to treat an animal better than a human it's their choice and they should not be judged. I, myself would give to an animal shelter before donating to a human cause.
I'm glad this story was posted so people will better educated themselves to not blindly trust the promise of a big chain.
@azntg: I get outraged at both, cruelty to humans and animals bugs me.
Just because I care about animals doesn't mean I don't care about humans too. Do you really think it's only possible to care about one and not the other?
Beating/killing a human is acceptable in the right circumstances. Nearly all the major Democratic candidates have said torture is proper when faced with an immediate terrorist threat (e.g., bomb going off in one hour and the person knows where bomb is). Killing as a state action is also permissible. Even as an individual action killing someone in self-defense is ok.
Not sure where the first poster has seen a white person just walk up to a black person or illegal immigrant and hit them because of their color or immigration status. Please give us some proof that this happens on a large scale where I should feel concern that I live in a country of racists and vigilantes.
Not sure why we had to bring the illegal immigration debate into a story about dog beatings.
Sounds like what happened is they watched the video without talking to the employee, but later maybe they talked to the employee and the employee explained what s/he was doing and asked them to check the video again.
I think a good test would be whether any of the dogs cower or move away from being touched. (but I'm not an expert)
It could be that the employee was playing with them in a way that looked like striking but either wasn't actually touching them or wasn't doing it aggressively.
I agree that if someone treated dogs well but not people that would be hypocritical. But it doesn't mean that dogs should not be treated in a civil manner.
It would be in Petsmart's best interest to help the customer understand why they don't consider that employee as mistreating the dog (if that's possible).
I wish we had some clarification here about what exactly happened. How hard did the employee hit the dogs? Did he strike them in the face? Were they injured? Were the dogs misbehaving in some way, or was this purely out of spite?
If the "strikes" weren't impressive enough to to even upset the dogs, I think it's probably a little extreme to demand that this employee never work with dogs again. I mean, this is a guy in a room full of dogs, not a pre-school teacher.
@7j6cei:
I'm not sure that being honest in this case would have worked great for PetSmart. Let's say, for argument's sake, that the district manager saw the video, was pretty sure the employee was striking the dogs, but wasn't concerned that it was that big of a deal. Let's say the employee needed more training on disciplining dogs but was otherwise a good and dedicated employee. If the DM is honest and says so, now Matt can report to the world that PetSmart beats dogs and does nothing about it. At least this way PetSmart has obscured the issue and no one can claim they support puppy-beating. (Not saying this is what they should have done, just saying that dealing with pet owners that sometimes hold extreme views makes normal customer service situations more challenging, this isn't like Best Buy just being straight-up evil)
Take the Michael Vick saga as a prime example. He's accused of dogfighting and the entire world goes crazy, demanding he goes to jail, never plays football again, etc. But when you have players like Ray Lewis who are accused of murdering two people one Super Bowl night, he doesn't even miss a single game. America has to get its priorities straight.
If I had this had viewed this incident, I would have first done what Matt correctly did and complain to the desk clerk, then I would have steped out of view to call the police and ask them to call an SPCA/animal control unit to the store immediately to review the video and make their determination on the spot.
The district manager obviously took it upon herself to spin the incident away from any legal scrutiny and subsequent liability for the company.
There's actually a simple solution to this. Call the police/animal control. They have it on tape! If I thought animals were being abused, I'd immediately call the police (and have!)
I do wonder if raising a hand and "striking a dog" could be accurately determined. The person knew he was being watched and it seems unlikely that he's hit several dogs.
Nonetheless, it was clearly handled wrong by Pet"smart". They should have explained that they were possibly herding the dogs or another interpretation. I volunteer at the Humane Society and we get complaints all the time about
"mishandling" . Things aren't always what they seem from a distance. However, we have 2 people investigate each complaint and give a full report about what happened to the person that complains. Most of the time it appears the animal was touched hard, but was touched lightly. Example: getting a dog back in a cage..you'll use your foot to block it from backing out, but sure enough, someone will say it was kicked. Complaints are good because they keep everyone in check.
Based on their response though, they are certainly off my list. Claims of animal cruelty should be handled with the highest level of analysis and explanation.
Here in Phoenix (where PetSmart is headquartered) we avoid both the Pet Hotel and the grooming by PetSmart. My parents, brother and I have all noticed traumatized behaviors in our pets after taking them there. My dog still cringes when he is brushed. Something he did not do until he was taken to PetSmart. A manager at one of the stores here told me that a large percentage of the workers in these two departments are ex-convicts. Apparently, there is some sort of program to train prisoners in dog grooming in the Arizona prison system.
These big chains just hire anyone off the streets. I went to the Petco in Norwalk, CT on the Post Road and heard this guy in grooming telling someone how he'll take dogs without their shots (which can be potentially harmful for any person or animal that comes in contact with said animal) and how he is able to steal from the store without anyone knowing. Well, needless to say, I told the manager and I don't think that dude works there anymore. People are stupid. A great locally owned pet store opened up down the street from me and I just go there now.
@azntg: I don't know about you, but if I see a petsmart employee beating up a customer, I think twice about being a customer!
Dogs naturally playfight with each other. I do a version with my dogs where I pet/tickle them on one side and they pretend to snap at my hand, I then raise my hand well over their heads and pet/tickle them on the other side. Rinse and repeat.
I could very well see this appearing to be striking dogs through a detached video feed with no reference. Girly may be correct that, with an explanation from an employee, the management was later more able to determine that they were seeing play (or something) rather than beating.
Of course, they should be more willing to replay the video for the customer review. I agree: call the SPCA/Animal Control. They do thorough investigations on complaints like these.
I strongly disagree with the blanket statement at the end of this article "If you need to board your pet, use a local kennel instead a chain pet store."
I had been boarding my greyhound with a local kennel - supposedly a frou-frou boutique place that took exquisite care of your pet at the outrageous price of $40 a night. But my dog always came home from that place anxious and having lost weight. I thought it was just the anxiety of being away from home. But after the time I picked her up and discovered her joints were covered in open BED SORES because she was not given enough bedding, I swore I would never use them again.
The local Petsmart PetsHotel, by contrast, has been a godsend. We can get a "suite" for my dog which is a room all to her self (no caging or crating) with comfy bedding and a tv... for less that the fancy boutique place. She comes home happy and calm, with no weight loss and no bed sores. I have been incredibly happy with the local Pestmart Pet Hotel and will continue to use them.
Also, they are very strict about the dog having all her shots - they call the vet directly to confirm every single time.
I think the real lesson is to keep an eye on the condition (mental and physical) of your pet after a stay in a kennel - it is not whether it is a chain store or local that makes it good.
I think all this underscores the importance of sharing, sharing, sharing information on businesses and products. I used to read the Bad Service Livejournal blog for this reason, but over the past year it's become overrun by whiners who never identify the businesses that did them wrong. I think all we have is Epinions and Consumerist, and perhaps Tripadvisor for hotels.
In my experience, PetSmart employees are not knowledgeable at all. One once tried to sell me an electric heat rock for (aquatic) firebelly newts. Besides being a potentially fatal electrical hazard, the temperature would kill the newts very quickly, as they need cold temperatures.
Matt did the right thing. Now the next step is calling the humane society and/or police to investigate.
For people who say animals are treated better than humans... try visiting a slaughterhouse.
I think the reason people get so upset about animals being treated badly, is because we humans equate pets with children. They are completely dependent on us to provide for them, nurture and protect them. Isn't that the same with children?
I can almost guarantee you that the tape has either been taped over, thrown away, or "disappeared". If the SPCA or police were to be involved, it should've been right then and there. What an unfortunate incident.
Yep, there is a program in Maricopa County where female inmates work with animals in a no kill shelter...but I guarantee the animals are better cared for than the prisoners...Maricopa County (AZ) is where the sheriff makes the prisoners live in tents, the animals at the shelter have AC :) I doubt the majority of the problem is from those ladies, its from people thinking that ALL the prisoners have animal care training and hiring them anyway, or being part of some program where the salary of the ex con is partly covered by the state so they hire whoever walks through the door with a parole officer because not only do they only pay 'em minimum wage, the store only pays part of that.
I would like to see the video before making an assumption. I worked in animal health for quite a while. Pet owners can be horribly disconnected from reality when it comes to animals and misinterpret benign activities. People running pet facilities can be very negligent. So it is hard to say either way. The person should have called the police and or local animal control. Animal control officers have legal authority and direct overlapping connections with whatever animal society works in the area. If something wrong did happen they would be a better objective third party to determine this.
The comment about just go find a local pet shop or kennel is not good advice either. There is nothing that monitors either or the staff of either. There are some horrible pet store or kennel owners that don't know what they are doing. Find somewhere by asking arounds. People that board frequently would be great sources since if something is going to go wrong they have more chances of running into it. We have had good luck boarding with the veterinary clinics we have used. Both were up front about how they handle boarding and were slow and small enough clinics that they could give proper attention to the dogs that boarded. Since our dog doesn't deal with other dogs well and is rather old boarding her at the vet works out pretty well. If she gets sick the people caring for her are skilled enough to notice it. She also isn't let out to play with other dogs for exercise. One of the clinics would let her hang out with the front office staff in the morning since she mostly hangs out wanting to be petted.
I worked for a kennel briefly when I was in college. I quit because the owner was so horrible. She had two dogs someone abandoned there. She would not adopt them out directly or through the SPCA. The two black labs had been kenneled so long they had become aggressive and lost their socialization skills. She also had a German Shepherd that had been abandoned there and gotten it's rear leg broken by being left in the dog run with the insane black labs. The kennel owners solution was to just leave it in a smaller run in the grooming kennels. The leg started to develop issues but she refused to take it for medical care.
She was gone for a long weekend and the entire staff got together enough money and found a vet to fix the leg. We did a jail break for this poor dog and told the kennel owner it escaped out of the exercise area gate. One of the groomers took the dog home and kept it. Sadly, the leg had to be amputated because it didn't get proper timely treatment.
You don't always know what is going on behind the scenes. Even a "nice" expensive facility can be a nightmare.
I take my dog to my local PetSmart in Mission, KS for grooming and boarding all the time and she LOVES it there. She gets very excited and nearly tears my arm off trying to get into the store when we go. The same way she acts when she realizes I'm taking her to the park to play. She even seems to recognize some of the people on staff and is happy to see them.
The staff also recognize her and know her by name. We normally pay extra to give her a full day of play so she isn't cooped up in her kennel all day and every time we come to pick her up she seems to be happy. So I wouldn't pin this on PetSmart as a whole but on an individual store/employee if that.
I know I can get pretty rough wrestling with my dog when we play and sometimes worry that people might think I'm hurting her. So without seeing exactly what happened I wouldn't even say that the employee was abusing the dog in this instance.
Dogs are pretty resiliant and play pretty rough amongst themselves. Some play rougher than others. I wouldn't worry about someone smacking a German Shepard on the side although use the same force on a yorkie and it might go sailing over the fence.
I would have confronted the employee myself and read him the riot act, explaining that his behavior is unacceptable and that I will be calling the authorities to make a police report.
You have to take responsibility if the store won't and do what you can to protect the dogs. I know it's just a dog, but would you let a parent act that way to their kid if you saw it happening?
My wife always gets mad at me for interfering with parents inside stores that treat their kids like dirt such as slapping them, pulling them by their arms in a forceful way, shaking them hard when the parent is mad and any other public displays of abuse.
Yes, I get told of a lot to mind my own business, but that is the point, it now is my business once I see something like this.
@JulieG: Yeah, the Mohave County animal shelter has prisoners working there. The guys I've met there seemed to be nice to the animals, though. Mileage may vary, I guess.
@dcaslin: I agree. If he wants to beat on poor innocent creatures, he should be working in a preschool. He's got no business hurting animals that aren't even of his species.
@Christovir: When I worked at Petsmart I didn't know anything about pets and I never had any interest in learning. Wasn't worth my time. I hated how customers would come in and think that the guy that stocked the shelves was an animal expert. If I was a expert I wouldn't be working at Petsmart.
Glad I quit.
I have a beagle right now. I hate the beagle (Little bastard) and wish it would die. I like the playful dogs that know when you're trying to play with them, by pawing at their noses and sides, or even tackling them. The beagle doesn't like to play, and freaks out. I miss my old dogs...
I won't take sides until I see the video.
@ThyGuy: " I hate the beagle (Little bastard) and wish it would die."
It's a shame that your mother didn't have better aim with the wire hanger.
I think it all kinds down to discipline. People do tend to see their pets similar to children. Would you like someone smacking your child or disciplining your child? No, they don't have the right to do such.
We can all safely agree that smacking a dog that is not yours for any reason short of defending yourself is completely unacceptable.
The one who smacked the dogs should be be brought up on charges. Since the evidence exists, you can persist upon that. I doubt this type of thing has not happened before, and if he continues to work there, it will likely happen again.
I wonder if Reader Matt, the OP, has ever watched "The Dog Whisperer"? I wonder if the OP has ever watched a pack of dogs, or puppies, playing?
I think if one is hypersensitive, some of the tactics used by Cesar Milan could be interpreted as "striking" the dogs. His objective is to show the dog that he is the "pack leader". If the human isn't going to be the pack leader, the dog will and will cause the human troubles.
Unfortunately, I have also seen this kind of behavior happen at Petsmart Pet Hotels. Where I worked, there wasn't really any kind of training. We were told to read the "manuals" and then thrown into a room of dogs. The dogs were not temperament tested at all, causing many dogs to lash out at one another.
As with most retail management, they left something to be desired. There were times where dogs would bite one another so viciously that customers in the regular part of the store (the playrooms were visible from the sales floor via huge plate glass dividers) would become upset and complain to management.
The employee striking the dog does not surprise me. We had several employees who would abuse dogs in front of co workers and customers. When this was brought to the attention of management, they pretty much laughed.
One of our cats likes to have her backside smacked. Not hard, mind you, but someone watching on a grainy surveillance camera might think I was abusing her.
Also, the last line of the post about using local places vs. chains - is that based on anything else besides the information presented in this article?
@azntg:
We get into a fit when an employee strikes a dog but we don't give as much of a sh*t if a person (of particular ethnicity and immigration status) gets beaten up and left for dead in a street?"
What's this "we" shit? Speak for yourself! I don't know a single person who doesn't find both dog-beatings and people-beatings reprehensible.
What I don't understand is that people are immediately jumping to judgment without having seen the video for themselves. I mean, the people who wrote the letter obviously can make that kind of judgment call. But the rest of the commenters? I mean, for all we know, the guy could have been playing with the dogs and the people who wrote the letter could just be over-reactive and looking for a cause.
Or, on the other hand, it could have been just as bad if not worse than what's suggested in the letter. The point is, why are we speculating about the turpitude of Petsmart and its employees when none of us have seen the ONLY piece of evidence that should matter in this situation: the video in question?
this place is local to us. we almost took our pet here a few times, but didnt. it really depends on the situation, but i think hitting our dog is appropriate at times. If he is out of control and goes to take a big chomp out of my arm, he is going to get a good slap on his nose. he has been trained to know better, and sometimes oversteps his boundaries. better to correct it now than have him maul a taunting kid in 2 years.
As far as paid dog-care, i think that is inappropriate to hit someone elses dog unless you have specific instructions that is is OK for discipline.
























I know I'm running against a popular opinion, but in my opinion, I think that in America, pets are treated better than how humans treat fellow humans. Frankly, I am deeply disturbed by that. We get into a fit when an employee strikes a dog but we don't give as much of a sh*t if a person (of particular ethnicity and immigration status) gets beaten up and left for dead in a street? Now, that's just wrong!