Lemon Pricing At Meijer Is Very Straightforward
Reader Tim says:
I saw this in a Meijer store in Grand Rapids, MI this summmer. Finally got it off of my cell phone and thought I'd send it your way. I'm still confused by it. I believe they were actually $2 per lemon when I rang one up.So, apparently the sign really means: "Lemons $2.00 each." That's a pricey lemon, we hope you did not buy it.
This sign is probably taught in existential philosophy classes.
(Photo: Tim)
This is a test using rich text formatting and html links. It's the generic "company" ad that should appear on all posts with the Company category if they don't have an ad attached to a specific company.
Post a comment
Comments:
This reminds me of a pricing experiment I heard of. Someone tested the consumer response to two signs:
One read, "Snickers! Buy extra for your freezer!"
The other read, "Snickers! Buy 12 for your freezer!"
The sign with the arbitrary quantity actually increased sales. Silly consumers!
It's just like grocery stores that say "5 for $10" when you can buy one for $2. Just psychology and the chance you'll buy 5 thinking you're getting a deal.
@cedarpointfan:
Please direct any content feedback/suggestions to the post's author. Editors' e-mail addresses are to the left of the page.
@mantari: Yes. I live near a Walgreen's drug store. The signs in there will say "3 for $9, or $4.00 each." At least in Mass., they are required to be that specific.
@mantari: they have to specify the individual price here (typically its in small print) but I dont recall ever seeing something that was 2 for 5 bucks and not 1 for 2.50.
I'll admit, this is not "news-worthy", but like any good media outlet, The Consumerist throws in the occasional comic relief made all the more enjoyable being that it is apparently real.
Perhaps you all think you're cleaver, what with your "This is news?" and "Slow news day?" comments. But the more cleaver probably refrained from commenting at all, having recognized that they've already wasted a precious few seconds reading the post and did not wish to waste even more with some redundant and obvious attempt at a quip. Better yet, the most cleaver of all might have recognized immediately that they were not interested and skipped down to the next post allowing those who might enjoy the ridiculous sign to indulge ourselves without enduring the barrage of comments suggestive of our feeble senses of humor.
@ragold: Lemon in Saskatchewan are usually the same as anywhere else in Canada: about $.70. Wait, with the exchange, that's about US$1.50. HA.
I'm sorry. But, you see, we've waited DECADES to be able to make jokes like that. I'm sure everything will be back to normal in a few months.
All of you who say, "What??? For THIS I burned 2.3 seconds of retina time? THAT's not NEWS!!!!"--
From now on, your comments should be deleted unless you can tell us what you think is valid news. Personally, I'm not excited about the Call of Doom stories, or anything about Best Buy (I mean, you read one story about Best Buy, you've read them all: they're crooks, what more do you need to know?). But those stories seem to do well with other readers. You know what I do about it? I don't click on the headlines that don't interest me. And if I do click on a boring story by mistake, I either close my browser or go to another site.
Try this at home. You'll like it.
Lemons are NOT $0.70 everywhere in Canada. I have never paid more than $0.33 for a lemon, even at the most rip-off grocery stores.
The person who wrote the sign probably has a little disconnect between his hand and his brain, thinking one thing and writing another.















Expensive lemons are a consumerist issue? Sure it's a confusing sign, but it's not like the ones at Walmart which are clearly just corporate mistakes. Just a dumb employee. The guy even said he "believes" it rang up as $2, which implies that it may not have anyway.