Too sexy for Southwest Airlines, Kyla Ebbert is a perfect fit for Playboy.
“Kyla Ebbert appears in a series of pictures — some in lingerie, some nude — under the heading, “Legs in the Air.”“They’re very tastefully done,” Ebbert told The Associated Press on Thursday. “I don’t see anything wrong with the female body.”
Kyla, honey, we love you.
[AP] (Thanks, Dave!)
More From Consumerist
-
Study: Southwest Is Often Only The Least-Expensive Option If You’re Checking Bags
-
Southwest Airlines Mails Lost Phone, Provides Outstanding Service And Terrible Poetry
-
Southwest Airlines' Fare Hike Will Probably Work Because The Other Carriers Are Sheep
-
Southwest Doesn’t Approve Of Your Cleavage-Baring Outfit, Young Lady
-
Man Claims Southwest Humiliated Him By Pulling Him Off Flight Because He’s Overweight
@noquarter:
Except no one else’s post involved mention of a baseball bat.
@noquarter: I was just responding to your quip that:
Not saying that she compromised her own principles.
I actually like the Southpark definition, along the lines of “a whore is anyone that does something that anyone else can do (i.e., no skill involved), except for money.”
(In the episode where Kenny does all types of Jackass “I dare you…” stunts for money)
Pics or it didn’t happen.
This is what makes America great.
Well now all of us can see what she had already exposed to the people on the plane that got her kicked off. Way to milk that 15 minutes of fame.
@CaffeinatedSquint:
Not sure what you mean — are you thanking christoj879 for the original comment, or thanking me for removing it?
@DashTheHand: Posing nude does not make you a whore, or an attention whore. However posting on here claiming it does may mean your jealous of her attention and therefore could mean that you are.
@vanilla-fro: So there is a nude photo? So what? My kids have seen my wife and me nude. So what? I’ll be taking them to Orient Beach in St. Martin too so that they don’t have hang ups like you and others clearly have and therefore seek attention on here like a …
@Skiffer: and you know she compromised her principals how?
@CaffeinatedSquint: Guess you were offended by Janet Jackson’s boob on the Super Bowl like Michael Powell says he was watching with his family? Got to love these puritans.
@valthun: I could care less who shows what. Your puritanical opinions as to who is a whore just shows that you can not handle the human body just like most Americans. Another sign of why the European way is the healthier way.
@homerjay, dashthehand, vanillafro:
You have as much reason to call her a whore as I have to say the same thing about your mom. Seriously, what’s so wrong with this? Are you all just jealous that nobody has offered you “slightly under 6 figures” to take your clothes off for a magazine? Maybe “whore” is just what you guys call girls that wouldn’t ever date you. I agree with Noquarter that you three are much more offensive than anything that Playboy could ever publish.
@skiffer:
Since when is being naked a sign of “compromised principles”? So we are all born with “compromised principles”?
Where are the ‘Why is this on Consumerist?’ posts? Jezebel, sure but here?
@CrazyRedd: I’m thinking more fleshbot..
Can’t everyone save the fighting and name calling for Thanksgiving?
Oh boy, she is such a But-er-face skank, just like her mom. Anyone remeber the panty shot when she was on the morning show with Matt?
@mconfoy: I mean if and when the kids friends find the pictures. My kids see me and the wife naked too. Their friends never will.
I just would have never wanted to be faced with my friends finding naked pics of my mom and these days those photos spread much further much faster.
@Hossofcourse:
LOL — Awesome.
@mconfoy: I didn’t actually care about the Janet Jackson boob. Whether it was accidental or not, I didn’t care. Actually, I was a little surprised because the game was being broadcast in my college basketball arena, and it was more like a 3 foot boob, so everyone around me was a little shocked too, but that’s beside the point. I think people can do whatever they want, whether they think it’s right is their business, as long as it’s legal. What I think is right or wrong does not affect what they feel about themselves or about something. I’m not puritanical, I’m simply saying that I think she likes attention, and the kind that she is getting is not the “I’ve got a good personality” kind of attention.
In an ideal world, guys and gals who aren’t all Brad Pitts and Angelina Jolies would be able to get dates easily, because perhaps they have good personalities, or a good sense of humor. In THIS world, not so much. A lot of times, girls don’t get much of a look past what they look like. The geek stereotype can swing both ways, so I guess it’s something of a peeve when a girl (even if she is pretty) might have a lot more to offer than just looks, but that’s not what she gets attention for. Guess I’m just being puritanical for believing that women and men have more than just good looks.
@Hossofcourse: We would, but Christmas creep came in August, so Thanksgiving pie throwing comes early too.
@dlab: to be clear, I don’t think the girl is an actual whore. I really don’t have an issue with playboy or porn itself, I just truly wonder if these girls think about the possible issues they may face later because of their choices. Hell at least it was just playboy, rather than hustler.
I did call her an attention whore and perhaps I should have just said she “she sure loves attention”. I thought the same of her prior to any playboy talk.
I love happy endings.
(Sorry, I couldn’t resist)
(And I’m not actually sorry)
“They’re very tastefully done,” Ebbert told The Associated Press
Damn… well, I dont want to see them anymore.
Even my momma predicted that the airline trashwhore would endup stripping for a skin magazine.
check out this xample of good follow-up marketing:
[www.nancarrow-webdesk.com]
Richard Branson welcomes Ebbert on SFO’s first Virgin to Vegas flight.
The whole concept behind Hooters is one of objectifying women. “Good food, cold beer and pretty girls never go out of style,” said Robert H. Brooks, the late owner of the restaurant chain in 2003.
(In other words:
*take one part over-priced/bland American cuisine
*mix in decor reminiscent of Porky’s nightclub (tip of the hat to Chuck Mitchell in a star-defining role)
*and throw in a bevy of nubile girls in hot pants for good measure.)
So news that this (medically well-endowed) woman would be predisposed to spreading her legs before the door mercifully closes on her 15 minutes of pseudo-fame is like moss growing on a tree. That is to say, it’s not (in the least bit surprising) news.
Sigh, couldn’t see this coming.
@StevieD: i’m sure she did, you know what they say.
I can’t believe Playboy choose this girl for their mag. I could see Maxim/Stuff, Hustler or Penthouse, but Playboy? I thought Playboy was about picking classy women, women who presented a positive image on socity and the human body. This attention whore is not worthy of gracing the covers of Playboy. There are women who dream of an achievement like that, that are rejected because of a slight imperfection and now it’s meaningless because Playboy just dropped the bar.
And for the record I’ve never purchased a porn magazine. That’s what the internet is for.
I actually like the Southpark definition, along the lines of “a whore is anyone that does something that anyone else can do (i.e., no skill involved), except for money.”
@Skiffer: But by that definition janitors and fast food employees are whores. That doesn’t make sense.
I thought Playboy was about picking classy women, women who presented a positive image on socity and the human body…
There are women…that are rejected because of a slight imperfection…
@shades_of_blue: Something about that seems contradictory.
I guess I just don’t see how going on a few television shows makes her such a horrible person.
The point is that she does not meet the high standards of Playpoy magazine, or are you going to argue that a women of high moral value would never pose nude? Because if you are, you’re the one on a high horse.
I’m merely stating that a breast augmented women with no talent, in her 20s, with the face of a 40 year old has no right to appear in that magazine. Playboy is about high society and class. That is their image and she does not fit. A classy women would not publicly wear a mini so short that her cuchie is visible.
You’re welcome to disagree, but by selling out Playboy has lowered their standards to more hardcore pornographic magazines such as Hustler. I personally know mothers who have purchased subscriptions for their teenage sons. They did so because they saw it as a tasteful alternative to hardcore publications and the more risqué web run porn sites.
If by chance someone from Playboy publications read this, I would hope they seriously weigh my opinion before they further degrade their public image.
How is this even remotely considered consumer news?
@therealhomerjaysimpson: I’ve been wondering that myself.
I like when women pose nude. They are not whores, simply more adventurous than the rest of you. VIV LE NUDITY!!!
P.S. Goto Europe and find out that north america is full of prudes, who have nothing better to do than complain about some woman who has the balls to show that she ain’t got no balls