The NFL Accuses Cable Companies Of "Curbing Competition"
Reader Sean forwarded the following email from the NFL, along with a note:
Hi guys,
Longtime reader of the site. Not sure how you see this email, but I find it to be insulting to my intelligence.
The NFL telling me I'm being held hostage by someone else, when in fact they are holding me hostage by not allowing me to buy the NFL Sunday ticket without switching to satellite.
The irony is, er, ironic!
As much as we love the NFL (and let's face it, we are obsessed with it), between the NFL network debacle and the Sunday Ticket Monopoly.... ugh! NFL, we love you, please fix this crap so we don't have to write about it anymore.
(For a refresher on the NFL vs Cable issue, click here. Long story short: NFL wants to charge cable companies to carry the channel for all of their subscribers. Cable companies refuse to raise their rates for an unpopular niche channel that only nerds like us watch (all hometeam broadcasts will still be available to local fans who don't have cable,) so they've moved the package to a "sports tier." )
PREVIOUSLY: Leaks: "Time Warner Cable Vs NFL Network" Customer Retention Document
This is a test using rich text formatting and html links. It's the generic "company" ad that should appear on all posts with the Company category if they don't have an ad attached to a specific company.
Post a comment
Comments:
good for the cable companies (god I feel icky saying that)
I hate watching sports. I think its the dumbest use of TV behind reality TV shows. I love playing them, and I am a weightlifter but watching sports to me is akin to pulling teeth and to be truthful I find pulling teeth much more enjoyable.
Of course this also goes into the if I was allowed to pick and chose my channels like I should be, a good 60-70 channels would be instantly gone. But in the meantime, keep crap like this, and the YES network and any other crap that makes my rate go up OFF my bill.
New Jersey sports fans,
Professional leagues like the NFL, MLB, and NBA continue to raise your sport-viewing costs and curb competition.
They are now placing games you might have once seen on broadcast networks on niche channels and specialized sports networks.
To increase their profits, professional sports leagues are holding you hostage by forcing you to pay extra for ESPN (Monday Night Football) and TBS (MLB Playoffs), by signing lucrative deals with these cable channels. These games used to be available to you without paying for cable. BUT NOW YOU PAY MORE.
I love football. I hate the NFL League however. Allowing EA to have exclusive rights to console/PC football games is one reason. The "family-fication" of the game as a whole is another reason I hate them. (Where are the "Hacksaw" Jim Duggan's of the NFL today? Neutered and gagged, thats where!) The G-rated halftime shows are crap now. (Janet's boobie incident was excellent! My son and I want more of that! So does my Tivo! Hell my wife thought it was awesome as well!)
Some sports just don't need to be family shows. Boxing and UFC are very successful with only an adult (intended) audience.
Don't get me wrong, I want kids involved with football, just not WUSSY football.
Wasn't there some leglislative activity about forcing a la carte cable options? Or did the lobbyists shut that down?
I watch maybe 1/3 of the channels that are available to me under extended basic cable. I'm forced to have that package because there are a few channels that I can only get with that package. A la' carte could solve a lot of these problems.
@ARP: cable companies and legislation go together like peas and ice cream.
The day that comcast caves to the FCC is the day I get to rip content off of my DVR. Literally.
I don't know if this is still the situation, but a friend of mine works for Time Warner and told me that the NFL was pressuring them to take this channel as part of "extended basic" (like ESPN) and wanted to charge a lot per subscriber. They wouldn't agree to let Time Warner offer it as part of a "sports tier" to only subscribers who wanted to pay for it. So, the NFL can go to hell, I couldn't care less about their games, their half-time shows, their overpaid star players. I think their abandonment of many of their retired players is worse than shameful and hope they're sued into bankruptcy over it. They can all go rot on the NFL Network, not shown on my TV.
FWIW, I'm ecstatic to be paying $4.99 for the Comcast Digital Sports Tier that includes NFL Network....
...because I also get The Tennis Channel, 2 channels (iirc) featuring High School Football, and several other channels I watch from time to time (golf, motor and extreme sports stuff). It works out to <$1.00 per month I'm paying for NFL Network based on how much I watch of each.
Ahh the NFL... where 90 miles away from the stadium you are considered to be in the blackout range of the team. Where stadiums are financed by tax dollars so the team can play there and then unless everyone sells out the stadium those taxpayers who paid for the stadium can't see the game.
Ahh the NFL, where you must have DirecTV to see their PPV programming. Where they put games on their own network and then demand more money to carry the game. Ahh, solve the problem? Provide the channel free to cable companies.
The NFL.. where I have to be subjected to Jets and Giants games because somehow Rochester is a secondary market for those teams, not Pittsburgh, Philadelphia, or Cleveland all of which are located closer geographically.
Or should we say, ahh the NFL, where criminals run free.
Glad I don't watch the NFL, or care about it.
i have to say, we just switched from comcast to dish specifically for the nfl package (i am a rabid packers fan, grew up watching them practice a block from my grandma's house) and i am so happy i could do a little jig- if tv were ever worth dancing about. the quality of the directv signal, programming, customer service & dvr are so far superior to comcast that i feel the nfl has done us a huge favor in this case.
Add me to those who think the NFL has unclean hands on this one.
@ Axiomatic: A pedantic point, but "Hacksaw" Jim Duggan is a professional wrestler. You may be thinking of Jack "Hacksaw" Reynolds, who played for the Rams and 49ers back in the day. He got is nickname in college by sawing a VW in half after a loss.
I'd heard on some economist talk show once say that the reason for increasing cable rates was partly to pay for the increasing costs to carry sports channels. People who don't want to watch are subsidizing the rest of the viewers who do. It's one of the reasons cited as to why cable companies don't want to offer ala carte programming. Want to watch BBC America, The National Geographic Channel, etc. then you'll still have to pay for ESPN, ESPN2, ESPN35Gajillion, and hometown peewee baseball channel as well.
If ala carte comes into being, you football and basketball fanatics might find the costs of watching your sports skyrocket.
If you had ala carte your bill would be astronomical. Most channels come in package deals. To get things like ESPN which is the MOST popular channel on cable by itself would cost about 20 dollars per month. It still costs your cableco about 4 per month per subscriber. By itself, ESPN has told them it would be more than HBO. So these popular channels would drive the price up very high for your cable. Many of the lower level package channels only cost 5 CENTS to 25 CENTS each per month per home. But the ad revenue help pay for the big ESPN's etc.
@qitaana: Yes I did mean Jack "Hacksaw" Reynolds. I Googled "hacksaw" only because I could not remember the name and didn't follow through. My bad. You are correct.
@bricko: Having "a la carte" options wouldn't preclude the cable companies' offering of packages, it would just require that they offer individual channels at a minimum. Sport freaks could still buy eleventy-seven sports channels in the "Armchair Quarterback Pack" I'm sure. Between the current state and a la carte, I'd like to see more targeted packages so I wouldn't have to have all the bible-thumper channels and the sports channels I never watch.
@Falconfire: I never understand people who post only to say, "I don't care about this." Why would you take the time to post?
Obviously, millions of people DO like to watch the NFL (and don't give a fig that you're a weightlifter). Why waste our time with your useless comments?


















Memo to the NFL: Pot...meet kettle.