Have You Gone Cellphone Only?
Money magazine tells us that a 2006 study reveals about one in eight American adults (26 million) live in households with no land line -- they rely solely on a mobile phone. This is up dramatically versus three years earlier when only 2.9 percent had no fixed line. And in the next five years, nearly one in three U.S. households says they'll cut the cord. — FREE MONEY FINANCE
This is a test contextual ad for the SHOPPING category. It should appear on all SHOPPING entries, unless the subcategory has its own ad.
Post a comment
Comments:
I'd be curious to see how these results break down once age is factored in. I'm 43, so I still have this attachment (irrational though it may be) to my landline, because that's ALL I had growing up and even into my early 30's.
I'm betting that the youger types (who may have had cell-phones since they were early teens) have no such attachment.
Just a thought...
I currently have only a landline. And coming up on November 13th, Comcast sees fit to discontinue my service whether I like it or not. I am seriously considering abandoning telephones all together at that point.
How neccesary are phones today? I have internet access and can probably make do with Skype using Skype out or a similar application.
@ltlbbynthn: I only have a landline because I barely get cell service in my home. If the service improved, I'd be cellphone only.
@mattatwork: I agree with you.
When I first moved out on my own a few years ago I got a landline becuase it was the thing to do. After a year I realized that I never used it. everyone called my cell phone and the landline just sat there. I canceled it and never looked back.
I also think number portability really helped the push to cell phone only. People were always afraid to give up their landline because it was the only number they had ever used. Now they can keep that number and no one is the wiser that it has been switched to a cell phone.
I'm in a similar situation. I have a landline but only for DSL. There's a phone hooked up although it's rarely used. I'm unfortunately using AT&T for my DSL and I'm hoping I can get the naked DSL and do away with a landline altogether.
My husband and I cut the cord about four years ago when we both had cell phones and a shared land line, the latter of which only rang with wrong numbers. We realized we were paying $60 a month to repeatedly tell people that the business formerly connected to the number was out of business and said funk that.
@ElizabethD: We had a slight service meltdown on 8/1/07 in the Twin Cities area, but everyone that called me was eventually able to get through, and most of my calls connected after one or two tries. It's a temporary inconvenience but still not worth the price of a land line.
I'd like to see a similar study about how many of us "new adults" are abandoning snail mail as well. I use maybe 10 stamps a year, and only for things that absolutely not be done electronically.
@ElizabethD: Landlines can die, too- relying on any technology to get yourself out of an emergency is the first mistake. Just because it's an older technology doesn't mean it has any better of a chance at saving your life.
@stpauliegirl: This poll is kind of fortuitous, because I just canceled my Qwest landline yesterday. I figured out the I was paying $48 a month (the cheapest plan they had plus taxes/fees) so that my parents could leave messages on my answering machine, so that companies could cold call me to buy their junk, and so that I could hook up my ReplayTV modem. So, I set up my cell phone voice-mailbox for my folks, hooked my DVR up to my cable modem and dropped Qwest.
And it's a good feeling.
Going landline-free, this month. When I added up the cost of landline plus dialup-ISP and realized that I could get cable internet for half the cost, the decision really made itself.
Luckily, I have good neighbors with landlines and live in a very urban setting. Finding a landline in an emergency would be a snap.
Most people I know, that is college students living in cheap apartments or houses, only have cell phones. No one wants to pay an extra bill for a phone nobody is going to call! We were just talking about this in one of my classes, actually.
The only time I've ever wanted one was for phone card purposes - my boyfriend lives overseas and you get a lot more minutes when you use a card with a landline vs. a mobile - but we use Skype most of the time so it works out.
@Squeezer99: Dallas is AT&T, I'm afraid. If naked DSL can save me actual money, I'd switch to that. I admit I haven't looked into it much.
Ditto @ the landline for dsl folks. I technically have both, but only for dsl. Important calls use the cell. Most of my communication is by email or aim.
@Steel_Pelican: Stamps and checks...things of the past. :) Except for rebates.
I technically have a landline, but I voted cellphone only, since Verizon forces us to have it for their slow-ass DSL. The ringer is off and I couldn't even tell you the number of the landline. I would have actually been in that 2.9% three years ago. Why the hell would I pay for a landline if I already have a phone that goes with me?
@Buran: just about. :) im pretty intolerant of things i find to be inefficient or wasteful. also ripoffs. therefore you could say im against the whole cell industry.
*sigh* i wasnt always this way. i was one of the first kids in school with a cell phone, 6th grade, and im now 24. go figure.
@LAGirl: Seriously, they require that you have a landline for DirecTV? That sucks. I was thinking of subscribing but I don't have a landline and I'm not quite sure I'd like to just to get satellite.
I can think of one good reason for having a POTS connection: Faxing.
Faxes have special legal status (they're assumed to be secure, whereas email and such isn't, and thus can be used for medical records and other such miscellany) -- but only if they go over POTS; T.37 and T.38-based faxing doesn't count.
My household has a POTS line, but only because my brother-in-law pays for it; his stated reason is to have a backup connectivity mechanism should our cable modem die.
@MissJ: Yeah, you need the line so you can buy PPV stuff.
Anyways it's most definitely land lines will be phased out.
Yeah... if it weren't for my job I'd never have a cell phone. They're just not that important. If someone needs me, call my damn house phone and leave a message. Not everything needs to be tended to immediately.
That, and my work cell service is crappy out in the country where I live, so it's nearly a moot point to begin with.
Also, on the house phone I've gone retro -- Custom Phones
Got me a pink rotary phone with an actual bell ringer.
Those iPhones have no idea what cool really is. ;)
Plus, I plug in my house phone and, oh my God, it just works. I don't recall ever seeing and old Model 500 rotary phone "brick".
The thought of using a pay phone today grosses me out, even though I would have thought nothing of it when I was growing up. And it seems like half the time the phones don't work. Have pay phones gotten worse--in terms of reliability and hygiene--as they have become less profitable for companies to maintain?
@boandmichele: How is a phone that you can carry around with you inefficient? Cells make phone conversations MORE efficient. No calling 5 locations to try to find the one person you want, you just call that person's cell. Also, you can't call a tow truck from the side of the road with a landline...etc.
@myuu: I know thats what the website said, but what if I never want to order PPV stuff? I've never ordered PPV in my life, if I don't intend to, do they still make you have a landline?
























I have a cellphone and vonage. Does vonage (which I can take with me) count as a landline?