Retire Early By Suing Google For Anything
You're likely reading The Consumerist in the middle of a workday, so we're guessing you're receptive to new ideas on how to make lots of money fast without actually doing any work. Here's a great way: just make up some reason to sue Google.
For example, last week a 25-year-old Pennsylvanian filed a lawsuit against Google because his social security number spells a scrambled version of "Google" when turned upside down, and consequently his safety is in jeopardy. He's asking for $5 billion in damages. His handwritten complaint also states quite clearly that not only is his right to privacy being violated, but that "Plaintiff and defendant(s) have a responsibility to fight the War on Terrorism."
Or here's another example: sue Google and Yahoo for stealing their names from your grandparents, who hailed from the Gogo and Yao tribes of Tanzania, like someone in Texas did last week.
See? It's easy. Here are some more ideas to help get you started:
- I thought Google was a palindrome but it turns out it isn't (this one smells like class-action).
- Google's ads are not always for products or services I am interested in.
- Google is a euphemism for my genitalia, and therefore has caused me millions of dollars worth of humiliation.
- Google gave me diabetes.
"What's in Google's Name?" [New York Times Bits Blog]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Nam malesuada commodo erat et molestie. Duis pellentesque aliquam bibendum. Suspendisse venenatis lobortis eleifend. Mauris id est sed lectus convallis aliquam.
Post a comment
Comments:
The handwritten claim is very similar to ones my previous company used to receive. Usually they were incoherent and rambling, often with inane demands. Most of the time, the BBB, FTC, FCC, CIA, FBI, NSA, President and/or a combination of them were copied on the complaint. The sad thing is that it was usually a sure sign of mental illness. While the Google suit above is laughable, hopefully this will lead to the Plaintiff getting some treatment.
I'm suing because based upon your allegation, Google rearranged as "leg goo" reminds me of Legos, which are toys, which reminds me of Mattel, which had lead in their toys, which scares me.
@jurijuri: Actually, Google was on the Maury Povich show the other day, and they are NOT the father.
From the document:
"13. Plaintiff and defendant(s) have a responsibility to fight the war on Terrorism
16. Plaintiff and defendant(s) could be subjected to detainment by The UNITED STATES OF AMERICA for suspition or acts and/or assisting in Terrorism or Affiliating with Terrorist Organizations"
Wha? Hahaha.
On a serious note, I hope that this guy gets the help he needs, hopefully he just missed some medication or something. :/
Wow, this guy's been busy, actually. Here are other things that he submitted all on the same day:
If he were from Texas I'd think it was really this guy: [www.mercerforpresident2008.com]
What happens to lawyers who take on these kinds of lawsuits from people who aren't well?
Hilarious frivilous lawsuits you say? This other guy is near famous for this stuff... The wikipedia article is good for a laugh.
Suing google is a shit load earlier than that.
All you have to do is throw some of your intellectual property and copyrighted material on the web and wait for google's spiders to find it and download it to their servers, as google downloads the entire internet (cache button under the results). They are hence forth stealing your IP for their own profit.
.
.
You can op out of it via the use of a certain script but that still does not clear google from copyright theft. When you think about it, Google is stealing IP and profiting from it.
@rmz: Wow, thanks for the link. Reading the rest is even better. Did you see the one about: "The "I don't know" defense obviously is a waste of money, time, and puts the lives of Americans and Illegal Aliens at risk of death or serious undress."
Lords knows, I would rather die than be seriously undressed.
Go read the rest of the BRIEF IN SUPPORT re 2 MOTION
The real funny thing is that he included every single piece of identifying information he has, from bank accounts to his library card, in his brief, which was subsequently scanned and put online by the clerk's office. I'd be amazed if he doesn't have about 237 new credit cards by now.
See Exhibits A, B, and C. (PDF)
They've redacted the info now, but it was unredacted for quite some time. Lucky him, it was images in a PDF, so Google didn't cache it.
I think perhaps this individual needs help - like all of the others who seem to sue over very obviously un-suable items.
Perhaps someone should remind him that if he's complaining about his SS# turned upside down to spell google, all one has to do is figure out the numbers that represent the letters in google to figure out his SS#.
Except a social security number has 8 digits and google only has 6...hmm.
@Rectilinear Propagation: If you look at the filings, you can see they're filed pro se, which means without a lawyer.




















I'm suing because Google killed the radio-star...