Bank Of America Refuses To Pay 80-Year-Old's $5,000 Bond
Bette Miller has a bond she purchased in 1984 from Rainier National Bank. That bank was purchased by other bank, which was then purchased by Bank of America.
Now Bank of America says they have no record of her bond and have been refusing to pay it since she first tried to cash it in 2 years ago.
Haggerty [Senior Vice President of West Coast Media Relations for Bank of America] said the only way to find out what really happened in this case is for Bette Miller to find tax records dating back 20 years or more.Both the bank and Ms. Miller have checked the unclaimed property office and there's no sign of the bond. Did it just disappear?"I think they're stonewalling her," said Bette's attorney, James Jackson. He's been trying to get the bank to honor Bette's bond.
"Claiming they don't have the records, when she has the original certificate, is insufficient," he said.
Jackson says the bond is proof that Bette didn't get her money.
"The only way that she would have been able to cash the bond out was by bringing the certificate with her," he said.
Those are the rules -- printed right on the front of the bond certificate.
'I want my money' [KOMOTV](Thanks, Sean!)
This is a test using rich text formatting and html links. It's the generic "company" ad that should appear on all posts with the Company category if they don't have an ad attached to a specific company.
Post a comment
Comments:
I'd imagine they'll end up having to honor the bond. Stingy BoA bastards. Luckily, I'll be closing my two deposit accounts with them this week hopefully, then, all I'll have left is a CC which got rolled in recently when they bought out MBNA, and that, -willing, will be paid off and closed by the end of the year. CRY FREEDOM!
@Geekybiker: She does, if you read the summary carefully (it's worded to indicate this) have the certificate. (I can't get the story to load. headline works, but not the story. Strange)
@topgun: I had an immediate distrust of them when they started issuing credit cards without the need of a Social Security number.
Why does this always come up? 1) This is in compliance with the rules set forth through Homeland Security after 9/11 and 2) There are other banks doing this.
If you have a problem with it, write your representative, don't complain because BoA is honoring US law. There are many legit reasons to hate BoA, there's no reason to make some up.
I think you misunderstood. She has the bond. BOA is saying they have no record of it, and thus, she must have cashed it in. She can't have cashed it in, because you have to surrender it for the money.
"Both the bank and Ms. Miller have checked the unclaimed property office and there's no sign of the bond. Did it just disappear?
They checked the unclaimed property office for the money, not the bond. Ms. Miller still holds the bond. Instead of Flickr interns, you guys really ought to hire copy editors.
I wonder if the lawyer is doing this pro-bono or is just racking up legal bills to stick to BofA. She probably could have just filed suit in small claims court for fraud and/or conversion and detoured this "dig up tax records from 20 years ago" garbage.
PS to any BofA stooges reading this column: thanks to your outright theft of $5 from my account in 1994, I will never do business with you again. penny wise and pound foolish, as they say.
It's her own darn fault! She should have ALL her tax records on microfiche, backed up on zip disk, stored on a hard drive in a fireproof box! She should have been reading the WSJ daily, monitoring the mergers, and called BofA immediately after each acquisition to verify the bond's status. Stupid consumer... expecting a bank to pay out money they owe you!
(tongue firmly planted in cheek)
Typical big-bank mentality. I'm glad I got out of Ranier Bank (by virtue of moving to Chicago, which is ironic since they're now the biggest bank in Chicago by number of branches and ATMs) when I had a chance. But still, it seems like they are preying on her, like a D-rated health insurance company hoping you'll die before your suit against them goes to trial.
HofA can hem and haw about their missing records all they want, but a bond is pretty much a bearer instrument and failing to make it good can get them into a lot of hot water if this goes to court. Think regulatory hot water. The confidence that a bank will pay on it's liabilities is central to our economy. BofA isn't just screwing this little old lady, they're screwing everyone when they don't pay what they owe. That's why banks issue bond certs, for crying out loud, because they're irrefutable.
This is definitely a Fed thing. I'm not sure, but don't savings bonds count as "Securities"? I'm sure BoA would want the SEC (or maybe the Comptroller of the Currency) would love to hear your story. Politicians _love_ stories where they can be seen as helping the little old lady against the big bad bank/hospital/government, etc.
I'm an investor. Let me tell you (and BOA) something.
This "Can't find the records" BS ain't gonna fly.If Wall Street gets an inkling that a bank won't honor their indenture and pay,they won't be able to give these things away. A bond is nothing more than a loan to a company and investors expect to be paid. Not when they get around to it, or when they "find the records",but when its due That said,most bonds are now sold in "Book Form" ,where the ownership is kept track of by your brokerage or in the company treasurers ledger.If this person has the physical certificate (again,rare these days) and BOA won't honor it,she will win her lawsuit easily.I would LOVE to be sitting on that jury, but alas, these things almost never make it to trial because big co.'s like BOA know that they can't screw somebody in plain sight of a judge and jury. Remember this the next time you read or hear some assclown demand "tort reform" or to "rein in runaway jury verdicts".I hope she wins and wins BIG...
@Snarkysnake brought up a good point, this lady is not a "consumer" in the traditional sense, she is an investor in BoA (by way of being an investor in whatever bank got eaten by BoA). I bet she could get a quick reaction if she went public on investor web sites.
Also, I haven't taken Securities Law yet, but wouldn't BoA's failure to pay put them in default? It would be a _giant_ deal if one of the biggest banks on the planet starts defaulting on its obligations.
*runs to closest BoA and withdraws all deposits*
@Bunklung: Normally I'd say "serves her right for choosing to bank with BofA instead of a well-intentioned credit union" but in this case, that wouldn't exactly fly since she didn't really get to choose anything here.
Still, I don't know why Bette Midler really cares about the money. She's loaded, isn't she?
/humor
She needs to contact the state office that oversees all the banks in the state - in this case it would be Washington State Dept. of Financial Institutions. They regulate all the financial institutions in the state and are there for the consumers. Banks do Not like having them on their ass.















talk to the Feds. That will shut them up