China Airlines Jet Explodes Into Balls Of Flame On Runway
China Airlines has the worst safety record for its region, with an accident rate of 4.59%
Post a comment
Comments:
Unconfirmed reports cite a group of enraged American cats boarding the plane before the event, with litte, tiny - but so cute! - suicide bomber vests. Linguistic experts say that before the explosion, the TerrorCats mewled, "Eat THIS, poisonboy," "Death to import murderers," and "Did someone hear a can opening?!"
even my amazing toyota motor will eventually blow up if i don't change the oil.
maintenance is the culprit here, i assure you.
The 4.59% accident rating cited in the article is completely wrong and way inflated. If you look at the referenced web site, it means that China Airlines had 4.59 more accidents than the "average airline" per million flights.
Note that this was fairly obvious by the fact that a number of airlines have negative numbers in that column, and unless you believe in reincarnation, it should be obvious that this number is not a percentage.
This news report is completely unfair and very sensationalist. The airplane appeared to be fine. In fact, the ENGINE IS NOT MADE BY BOEING AND IS SELECTED BY THE CARRIER. If an engine blows up, it's not the air frame manufacturer's fault at all. IN FACT it looks like that BOEING 737 saved hundreds of lives by absorbing the impact from that engines eruption. Secondly, even if the engine exploded, the chances that it is the fault of the engine maker are very low. GE and Rolls Royce, who are big airplane engine manufacturers, make an extremely high quality product that tend to have almost no problems, UNTIL the carrier fails to properly maintain them.
Often, especially in CHINA fake parts are used to repair aircraft and engines resulting in these problems. I am willing to bet that once the investigation is completed on this incident, we will see that it is not the fault of either the plane or engine manufacturer.
Why is it one way or another it is always China's fault? Now that the product was made in America, it's not the manufacturer's fault, but the maitenance? and is it China or Taiwan Airlines?? 120 or 165 people? maybe people really need to get their facts straight first before posting or making ignorant comments.
@gibsonic: when was the last time a 737 blew up at all? I'm sure this is a rare occurrence, exaggerated once again my the media in an attempt to China bash. Why don't people realize that the government is turning China into America's scapegoat?
1. China Airlines is a Taiwanese carrier (and has a checkered safety history).
2. Taiwan is the Republic of China and although the People's Republic of China diputes this, Taiwan is a different country than the Consumerist whipping-boy.
3. Although the Chinese as a culture eat some strange things, widespread cat-eating is a myth ([www.snopes.com]).
4. Everyone made it off the plane alive--thank goodnes. The last massive accident involving an airplane occurred in Brazil in which everyone perished. My point being that it would be super-neat for people to dial down the xenophobia.
OK, there are several things that people need to keep in mind.
There is an Air China, and a China Air. Air China is run by the People's Republic of China. China Air is run by the Republic of China, also known as Taiwan. The People's Republic of China is Communist and where all the poisoned stuff is coming from. The Republic of China is not.
There is a difference, and if you can't bother to distinguish the two, you shouldn't be reporting the news.
Is Consumerist (and the whole Gawker network, for that matter) really so desperate for pageviews that it can't/won't embed movies on the front page? As a user, I find it incredibly annoying to click what appears to be an embedded movie only to go to a separate page where I have to click it again. Frustrations like this will cost you visitors.
@esqdork: The confusion between PRC and ROC is annoying, but it is indisputable that China Airlines (neither Air China or China Air) has an abysmal safety record.
"China Airlines has the worst safety record for its region, with an accident rate of 4.59%"
That is FLAT OUT WRONG. Yes, they have the worst rating, but the idea that there is an accident 5% of the time is INSANE. PLEASE READ THINGS CAREFULLY. Here is the calculation:
The Accident Rate is calculated as follows:
Accident Rate = (actual number of accidents - expected number of accidents) or
Accident Rate = D - (A *(B/C))
where
A = number of million flights completed by the airline
B = sum of fatal events for all airlines
C = sum of million flights for all airlines
D = adjusted fatal events
The Adjusted Fatal Event is calculated as follows:
The actual "fatal events" is adjusted upward or downward depending on what percentage of people are killed in each accident. The calculation of "D" or Adjusted Fatal Events is illustrated in the following example.
An airline has 3 fatal accidents:
In the first accident 120 out of 120 passengers are killed.
In the second accident 75 out of 150 passengers are killed.
In the third accident 5 out of 200 passengers are killed.
120/120 = 1
75/150 = 0.5
5/200 = 0.025
Instead of 3 fatal events for D in the formula above, 1 + 0.5 + 0.025 or 1.525 is used.
[72.14.253.104]
@NickRB: The 737 series doesn't have engine options; for the original -100 and -200 versions, you got the P&W JT8D. The -300 and later use the CFM56 family.
So the engine choice was actually made by Boeing.














Plus all that lead paint burning! Japan is going to be pissed.