American Airlines Flight Grounded After Passengers Complain About Men Speaking Arabic
According to the Associated Press, an American Airlines flight was grounded after passengers complained about 6 men who were speaking Arabic. The men had been hired by a company called Defense Training Systems to train Marines at Camp Pendleton.
American Airlines spokesperson Tim Wagner said that local law enforcement was called in to question the men but the TSA did not get involved. He also said that passenger traveling with two small children got into an argument with the men, but declined to say what it was about.
[Dave Stephens from Defense Training Systems] said some passengers complained after hearing the men speak in Arabic, but he declined to elaborate.People, let's try to behave ourselves on the airplane? Shall we?"I wish I could say more because I have personal feelings but this is what I'm allowed to say," he said.
The plane returned to the terminal at 11:26 p.m. and was held overnight because of an 11:30 p.m. curfew at Lindbergh Field. The were 126 passengers booked on the flight.
The flight left San Diego Wednesday morning and arrived in Chicago in the afternoon.
Plane bound for Chicago held after dispute involving Arabic-speaking men [Chicago Tribune]
(Photo:Kurmbox)
This is a test using rich text formatting and html links. It's the generic "company" ad that should appear on all posts with the Company category if they don't have an ad attached to a specific company.
Post a comment
Comments:
@Hossofcourse: It's a complaint if it's just hearing the other language. There is nothing within reason that should concern anyone about simply hearing arabic spoken.
@Ben Popken: There's gotta be. I'm dying to find out what the argument was about.
The men had been hired by a company called Defense Training Systems to train Marines at Camp Pendleton.
I wonder if that will matter or if someone will still claim that they were only speaking Arabic to cause trouble like in the other posts about similar incidents.
@Hossofcourse: The airline probably considers anything that the passengers come to their crew with a complaint. For them what would be the difference between a concern and a complaint?
The Associated Press
August 30, 2007
Shit, I know the news cycle is getting shorter and shorter, but an article published today about a story that happened late Tuesday/early Wednesday is not just old, but "ridiculously old"?
Seems to me we don't have all the details. What provoked the fight? Someone with the mindset who would complain that the passengers were speaking Arabic and the flight should stop probably isn't smart enough to know they were speaking Arabic or Chinese. And someone who could actually figure out they were speaking Arabic is probably worldly enough not to assume they want to blow up the plane. I find it hard to believe AA would stop a flight because one passenger told a flight attendant someone was speaking in some 'furrin language.
I have to agree...there seems like a huge back story that no one is at liberty to talk about yet. If these guys were working for the government, couldn't they just have proved that? Weird story; looking forward to the whole of it.
I find it hard to believe AA would stop a flight because one passenger told a flight attendant someone was speaking in some 'furrin language.Well I dunno. Regrettably I don't have the links to prove it, but this is not the first time this has happened. And I'm not just referring to all the fear-mongering in the air immediately post-9/11.
@stanfrombrooklyn: I now have a third category of annoyance:
1. "Get a credit union" people who think that's the answer to any financial problem;
2. "Blame the victim" people who think that someone must have done something wrong to have gotten screwed by profit-minded megacorps;
3. "I don't think this should be posted on this site even though it's not my site and not my choice" whiners.
@Toof_75_75: If they work in pretty well any capacity for the US Gov't, they'd have some form of Gov't ID. I work as a Gov't contractor and have always had a Gov't ID... So I wholly agree, there has to be a lot more to this that's not being said yet.
And I know Army Soldiers who sit around speaking Arabic... because they're linguists. Oh, the joys of profiling.
Not only do I concur with Ben's sentiment that there must be a lot more to this story, but it feels like the Arabic aspect of things may not even be the central point in the actual dispute -- feels more like the reporter played it up because it touches a nerve and s/he couldn't get the rest of the details.
@Buran: Meg was pretty clearly referring to the complaining/arguing passengers when she said "let's try to behave ourselves," so let's rein in the accusations of racism.
@Buran: (Re: annoying commenters) On the other hand, I wholeheartedly agree with this comment. What's especially perplexing in this case is that a mere one minute earlier, stanfrombrooklyn found this post interesting enough to post a substantial comment on it. Yet at 12:56, the story magically became unworthy.
@stanfrombrooklyn: I believe the "Unruly Passengers" tag can be considered a subset of the "Bad Consumers" posts.
This sort of thing is a consumer concern because:
1) It affects the ability of anyone who looks Middle Eastern to fly anywhere
2) It affects the ability of anyone on a plane with someone who looks Middle Eastern to get where they're going
3) It keeps happening
@Buran: I think Meg was referring to the people complaining about the men speaking Arabic. Or at least the passenger who got into a fight with them.
Plus, would they be issued government IDs if they were working for a private government contractor?
BTW, there's a press release on the front page of [www.defensetrainingsystems.com]
cmon! who WOULDNT get a little nervous/wary about 6 arabs on YOUR flight these days? Speaking a foreign language just adds to the problem.
Yeah, I know I am gonna get blasted for this comment, but you'd think arabs would realize that bringing attention to themselves aboard a US flight is going to end badly. Its like walking into a bank with a hat pulled low, sunglasses on & a gun-shaped bulge in your pocket. You are just asking for trouble!
@laddibugg: I suppose that'd depend on the company and/or the company's interface with the Gov't. (some are just much more "in bed" with the Gov't than others)
I work with a smaller contract company and I waited to get my ID... But I've known people with bigger (read: huge like KBR or CACI) companies and it seemed to me they had their Gov't ID's well before I would've been able to get mine...
Now I'd personally assume that if they had just accepted their job offers and were heading to Pendleton to begin their jobs then, no, they'd have no form of Gov't ID at that point. They'd possibly have some form of company Offer Letter though, but that's not ID per se. If they did have Gov't ID at that point I'd think something fishy was up. (no profiling, it's just that Gov't ID's are typically treated as "sensitive items" and they're quite difficult to get unless you really do have the right paperwork to get one)
All this makes me really really wonder what the whole story is here.
@Rectilinear Propagation: I'm still a bit stunned that people think that a group of people speaking their native language is done for the express purpose of aggravating people. By that same logic if I go to France and speak English they should view that as a hostile act and treat me accordingly. Idiots.
@nctrnlboy: They can be nervous, I'm not going to stop them. However, they probably shouldn't start a dispute serious enough to keep a flight from leaving.
Let's say you're a woman walking through a dark parking garage at night and there's a man walking in the same general direction. Obviously, women have been raped and killed in this situation before so I wouldn't blame her for being nervous and wary in the situation. However, I would blame her if she picked up a heavy, blunt object and knocked him out just because there's a precedent.
@nctrnlboy: Seriously. And all those black people who went around with their skin all hanging out and stuff 50 years ago...they were *totally* asking for anything they got.
You, sir, are an idiot.
@Erskine: I work for a private contractor and have a Gov't issued ID, even when I'm not deployed. It's because of where I work though.
I'd assume that these guys on the airplane would've gotten Gov't ID's at some point, assuming they'd actually be working on Camp Pendleton.
But yeah, there's lots of weird Gov't rules about ID's and such... it seems like the same rule is never applied twice sometimes...
@omerhi:
I think there is a bit of a difference between outright acceptable racism that happened 50+ years ago & the current high awareness/sensitivity to the REAL possibility of middleastern highjackers on a US flight. Add in the fact that it was a group (speaking arabic) of 6 of them & an altercation ON the plane.... what do you expect? Just being midleeastern isnt reason for suspicion.... a group of them speaking arabic ramps it up a bit though (throw in an altercation & the level gets even higher).
It's interesting to read these comments, and not wonder if every single one of you, would not at least do a double take or raise an eyebrow seeing 6 Iraqi men (middle-eastern) waiting in line for your flight, speaking a language unknown to you. I'm not incinuating anything, but rather pointing out how every American's mind works post September 11, 2001.
Where the story doesn't make sense/jive - if they are liaisons to the US government and US soldiers they obviously all know English, (unless our military is just plucking any Iraqi residing in the US to elaborate on their former culture) why raise irrational unjustified fears for no reason? Would speaking English have prevented this? Maybe not. But, my point is that the story isn't all jiving.
@nctrnlboy: Lesson learned then - if you're middle eastern (or even if you're not and simply could pass for middle eastern), split into pairs and travel separately. Problem resolved.
"People, let's try to behave ourselves on the airplane? Shall we?"
I'm assuming you are referring to the people who made the complaint, not the Arabic-speaking folks. Or perhaps you mean both parties as they did engage in some sort of argument. I'm just saying, someone new to this site could interpret your comment any one of these ways.
I'm sorry, but in today's day and age, six Arab men having a lively conversation in Arabic is going to make people nervous. You can either, A. Ban all Arabs from riding in groups greater than 3 on planes, or B. Deal with occasional incidents like this one. You are not going to change whether people get nervous or not.
She got nervous and wanted to get off, should they have prevented her from getting off the plane? Not allowed her to complain? Once someone complains they have to investigate it or there will be MASSIVE witch hunts if something actually does happen on the flight.
@Erskine: Methinks before you blast someone you should learn to spell Moron correctly.
I see his point, when I travel overseas I keep the American attitude real low. And it's not just here that it could happen. I was in Poland and I accidentally spoke to one of my friends in english instead of the German we were speaking....you could of heard a pin drop in the bar. Lets just say we left quite quickly under the glare of the locals.
This is an excellent point. America is the only country that seems to use the term "racial profiling", (probably created by some leftist housewife living in her Orange county suburb) every where else in the world, it's called, "life."



















Methinks there is much more to this story.