Whole Foods CEO Caught Bashing Wild Oats Stock On Yahoo Forums
Back in 2005, when the (currently being opposed by the FTC) Whole Foods/Wild Oats merger was just a glint in the Whole Foods CEO's eye... John "Anonymous Troll" Mackey was on Yahoo! forums bashing Wild Oats stock.
Stock that he wanted to buy. From Smart Money:
In January 2005, someone using the name "Rahodeb" went online to a Yahoo stock-market forum and posted this opinion: No company would want to buy Wild Oats Markets Inc., a natural-foods grocer, at its price then of about $8 a share.Mr.Mackey defends the postings on Whole Foods' website,"Would Whole Foods buy OATS?" Rahodeb asked, using Wild Oats' stock symbol. "Almost surely not at current prices. What would they gain? OATS locations are too small." Rahodeb speculated that Wild Oats eventually would be sold after sliding into bankruptcy or when its stock fell below $5. A month later, Rahodeb wrote that Wild Oats management "clearly doesn't know what it is doing. . . . OATS has no value and no future."
The comments were typical of banter on Internet message boards for stocks, but the writer's identity was anything but. Rahodeb was an online pseudonym of John Mackey, co-founder and chief executive of Whole Foods Market Inc. Earlier this year, his company agreed to buy Wild Oats for $565 million, or $18.50 a share.
For about eight years until last August, the company confirms, Mr. Mackey posted numerous messages on Yahoo Finance stock forums as Rahodeb. It's an anagram of Deborah, Mr. Mackey's wife's name. Rahodeb cheered Whole Foods' financial results, trumpeted his gains on the stock and bashed Wild Oats. Rahodeb even defended Mr. Mackey's haircut when another user poked fun at a photo in the annual report. "I like Mackey's haircut," Rahodeb said. "I think he looks cute!"
Mr. Mackey's online alter ego came to light in a document made public late Tuesday by the Federal Trade Commission in its lawsuit seeking to block the Wild Oats takeover on antitrust grounds. Submitted under seal when the suit was filed in June, the filing included a quotation from the Yahoo site. An FTC footnote said, "As here, Mr. Mackey often posted to Internet sites pseudonymously, often using the name Rahodeb."
"I posted on Yahoo! under a pseudonym because I had fun doing it. Many people post on bulletin boards using pseudonyms." He said that "I never intended any of those postings to be identified with me."The FTC is currently challenging the Whole Foods/ Wild Oats merger, claiming that it is anti-competitive and bad for consumers.Mr. Mackey's post continued: "The views articulated by rahodeb sometimes represent what I actually believed and sometimes they didn't. Sometimes I simply played 'devil's advocate' for the sheer fun of arguing. Anyone who knows me realizes that I frequently do this in person, too."
Whole Foods CEO Hid on Message Board [Smart Money] (Thanks, everyone!)
PREVIOUSLY: Whole Foods Will Consume Wild Oats
FTC: Wild Oats Whole Foods Buyout Bad For Consumers
This is a test using rich text formatting and html links. It's the generic "company" ad that should appear on all posts with the Company category if they don't have an ad attached to a specific company.
Post a comment
Comments:
Seems almost typical for a Yahoo! Finance message board. You've got your usual crowd who is totally bashing the stock, and you've got your few who are constantly pumping it up. All of them are broken records, so you can expect little in the way of critical analysis.
To semi-quote one such Yahoo! Finance poster:
Goldman Sachs has rated this stock a strong smell!!!
When does the video "CEOs Behaving Badly" staring Michael J. Fox arrive on Netflix?
It doesn't matter if it was fun or not, there's certain ethical rules that CEOs have to play by if they head a public company. It's refreshing however, that this is something entirely different rather than the drab old insider trading or having sex with someone else's wife.
The press keeps bringing out folks saying that no matter how unethical, and bizarre, this may have been it isn't necessarily illegal.
I simply can't believe that. Here he was, actively trying to take over a company, and going to one of the most popular stock boards in the world during the heyday of day traders, and trying to drive the price down.
That he failed (he said it wasn't worth $5 a share, he ended up paying - or at least trying to - $18+ a share) is irrelevant. What he did seems pretty darn illegal to me.
Interestingly, you haven't really heard a peep out of the feds. Only Mackey's damage control lackeys. I bet someone makes an example out of him.
@bohemian: I hope you get a Trader Joe's. I've never been to Wild Oats, but Whole Foods charges much more than TJ's.
I brought flowers for a friend in the hospital (and food for her fiance-now-husband) and wanted to stop at the closest store so the food & flowers wouldn't be icky after the hour+ drive. Whole Foods charged for two STEMS what I'd pay for a full bouquet at TJ's, and I got a few items for what a bag of food would have cost me at Trader Joe's. Reminded me of the days when the only vegetarian food I could find (beyond produce) was at the health food store: $35/a bag of groceries.
As for that Mackey guy, his wife, Deborah, must be mortified that her CEO husband has to hide behind her. His mother should be ashamed for raising a taunting bully. (I'll treat him like a child until he acts like a responsible adult, 'k?)
I heard the story on the news a few hours ago. For some reason, I get happy when I read it first online - like my feeds are worth something, or like I'm actually learning something. or sometheing.
I think the question of legality is dependent on the timing and content of the individual posts. There are times when any company insider can't say ANYTHING about their company in a public forum without ensuring that the information is officially released. Alternatively, if he released any insider information with the intent that anyone acted on it, then I think that too would be illegal.
If instead he was merely (as he claims) repeating things in the public domain, and if this was done at times when he was not subject to a blackout - then I guess he would be free and clear in a legal sense. I would expect that unless he controls a majority of the WFMI stock he will be tossed out as CEO.
Seriously, this guy's a bit of a retard, but the FTC blocking the Wild Oats / Whole Foods merger is rediculous.
Somehow ATT can buy back every telephone service provider in the country, but two high-end organic markets merging is anti-competitive? Will this merger suddenly cause every farmer's market in the country? Honestly.













Amazing. Was he posting as a woman/gay man? It would explain the "haircut looks cute!" comment. And also, a lot of things about his scary inner life.