Should I Put A Brick In My Toilet To Reduce Water Use?
A common trick for people concerned about water use is to put a brick in the toilet tank. However, some Public Works departments would prefer you fill a plastic bottle with sand or rocks and put that in the tank instead. They say that bricks can disintegrate and damage plumbing.
Toilets know when to stop filling with water once the water reaches a certain level. By displacing that water with an object, you reduce the actual amount of water needed to tell the toilet it's ready for action. It's likely you don't need quite the full 1.6 gallons per flush (or whatever) 10-gallon hat, so to speak, to do the job fine.
Alternatively, you can install a lo-flow toilet. — BEN POPKEN
Post a comment
Comments:
The 'floater on the metal arm' is also known as the 'ball cock'. Yeah, you heard me. And yes, lowering the ball in the tank will decrease the amount of water filling the tank/bowl. However, most newer fill valves don't employ a ball cock. There is typically some sort of limiter clipped to the shaft of the fill valve which can be adjusted up or down to control the water level.
I like the 'rocks-in-a-plastic-water-bottle' idea best. I expect that a plain old brick would leach pigments that would stain the fixture. Likewise, if the weirs in the toilet were to get clogged with sediment or pieces of brick snaking them out is an incredible pain in the ass, so to speak.
Rather than put something in the tank that can cause problems down the road (such as shifting and holding the float open, yes, I've seen this happen), most floats are adjustable, whether it's the old ball style float (bend it, as mentioned earlier) or the collar-valve kind in newer toilets (there's a tension lock that can be adjusted to adjust the float depth). Easy and avoids adding extra crap to the tank of your toilet.
im always surprised when i hear this info passed around... i dont think ive ever encountered a toilet that didnt let you adjust the ballcock to control the amount of water that is flushed into the bowl.
ive also heard that putting a brick in the toilet helps save your energy bills, because it absorbs heat and helps keep the water warmer in the winter, thus not drawing heat from the surrounding area. it doesnt make any sense.
id love to know the actual validity of these
.....I bought an old house with old toilets. One toilet I fixed with a Fluidmaster kit, which allows you to adjust the fill level.
.....The other toilet came with a cracked tank that was leaking. I replaced the tank, but of course was stuck with a 1.6 gallon model. I had to modify/rig some components to make the tank fill higher than it should. Otherwise, the next user tends to find floaties and such... I should probably replace the bowl, too, but the thought of messing with 80-year-old cast-iron drain fittings stops me every time. It ain't broke, so...
One thing to keep in mind is that most low flow toilets are designed as a unit. The low flow tank and valve are matched to a bowl designed for the specified flow. Reducing the water volume in the tank of an older toilet may reduce the water used per flush, but it may make the toilet flush less effectively, perhaps requiring multiple flushes. Adjusting the flush volume a little probably won't cause any problems, but large adjustments could negate any water savings. Every little bit helps, so this is a good idea if you don't want to buy a whole new toilet, but the best way to go would be a new complete fixture.
@kerry: I saw that soft closing lid once in a house I rented on vacation and I've wanted one ever since (yes, this is what occupies my mind) but have'nt beeen able to find them. Any idea where they got it?
One giant culprit of water waste is the toilet flap.
You have to check it for leaks by using a dye (a simple blue toilet dye like tydee bowl will work). Let the dye color the water and look for any water leaks going into your bowl.
A low flush toilet will still waste massive amounts of water if the flap has a bad seal.
I replaced all our toilets a couple of years ago with these:
http://www.kk.org/cooltools/archives/000986.php
They work really well, and have taken everything I've thrown at them. I also like that they're one-piece toilets - the tank is built-in. I'd been having problems with the tank bolts corroding and leaking on the old ones. Problem solved!
@kerry: The two-button toilet is standard in sun-baked Australia. I'm surprised it hasn't caught on here - at least in the more drought-prone states. There's money to be made in them thar shitters!
@homerjay: Toto (not the band, not the dog) makes many soft-close lids: http://www.totousa.com. I had one once, but I actually found it annoyed me more than soothed me. It was like a keyboard with no click!
@Jay Levitt:
Holy Crap! $60 to $120?? REALLY???? Yikes.... I don't know if the sound of silence is worth THAT much.
@Pelagius: "We got a little rule back home: If its brown, drink it down. If its black, send it back."
OR
"If its yellow, you've got juice there fellow. If its brown, you're in cider town!"
The two-button toilet is a good idea. The low-flow toilets I have in my house are terrible. When it comes down to business, they really work like sh.....shabbily engineered devices. It's a clever idea to have two different flush volumes; 1.6 GPF seems like a poor compromise at best..overkill for liquid, but it doesn't work very well at all for solids. Where's the water savings if you have to flush the stupid thing 2 or 3 times?
Oh and on top of it they want us to use these stupid compact florescent light bulbs that are dim and give off a yellow glow. Ill keep my 100W reveal bulbs thank you. Stop telling us how to live our lives and live yours they way you want. Its none of your business if I want a high flow toilet, high pressure shower head, bright lights, and drive a Hummer. You can have your wimpy stuff and "save the earth"
I installed a low flow, pressure assisted toilet in my last house (been to lazy in my house now). Aside from the jet engine whoooosh that scared newbies the first time, it was the best toilet I ever had. The old, non low flow toilet would occasionally, um, require manual assistance, but not the pressure assist model.
@ptkdude:
It's not the no.2 that the water waster (the average person craps about once or twice a day) it's the no.1 (averaging 7-10 a day)
@WindowSeat:
I love when I walk into someones bathroom and all you smell is the stench of piss that's been rotting in a toilet for the last 5 hours. Please, for my sake, flush it down.
@MadMolecule:
They have the pressure assisted ones on cruise ships. I swear, if I ever flush it while sitting on the bowl, I'll be sucked right down that 2 inch pipe myself.
@jwissick:
I'm with you on the low-flow toilets. I hate them! Flush, flush, flush. We are definitely *not* saving any water with these stupid things.
I don't see why you can't just get the 'dual-flush' mechanism that is standard issue on all Japanese toilets. Basically you push the lever one way and it uses less water for #1. The other way uses more water for #2 (I won't get into why the heck it says 'big'/'small' for this distinction on the lever :P). In any case water consumption for toilets in Japan is very small because of this.
So many people just don't understand the brick in a toilet "trick" which just makes your toilet under-perform for water conservation.
1. Look inside the tank while you flush. Note the water level at it lowest point. If the brick is completely below that, it is doing *nothing*.
2. Get one of these toilets: American Standard
Champion™ Right Height™ Elongated Toilet Bowl, currently $150 at Lowes. They work off of suction rather than downward pressure. They are still 1.6 GPF. I have these in my house and in my rentals because they use less water and tend not to clog which saves me time and money. You can identify these kinds of toilets because they're usually described as high flow and have a 3" or bigger flap inside the tank allowing the tank water to empty *very* quickly.


















You should ziploc bag the brick.