AT&T Draws Wrath Of iPhone-Seeking Alaskans
AT&T will leave Alaskans eager for an iPhone out in the cold. The telecom provides services to the 48 contiguous states and Hawaii, but not Alaska. The free-minded state isn't taking the slight lightly. The Anchorage Daily News has issued a call to committed adventurers: Go South, Young iPhone Seekers!
Buy a plane ticket to the nearest AT&T or Apple Store (at least $350 to Seattle) and misrepresent oneself as a Washington resident. Get ready to pay sales tax for the phone plus a yet-unknown amount for the service plan. Or find a friend in the Lower 48 to do the misrepresenting, in which case shipping runs $1.48 to $16.25.How to keep AT&T's nosy location-tracking network from disconnecting you after illicitly acquiring your precious, precious iPhone, after the jump...
AT&T spokesman Mark Siegel refused to tell the Daily News how long iPhones would work on Alaska's network, so the paper had one of its interns call AT&T customer service and ask.
An obliging customer service agent explained that if AT&T's computer sees four months of chitchatting in Alaska (or elsewhere out of AT&T coverage area), service will be automatically canceled.For those who mess with Texas, really, you should try Alaska sometime. — CAREY GREENBERG-BERGERBut if you call AT&T ahead of time and explain to them that you'll be on an extended trip, you can avoid service termination -- at least for a little while.
In a second phone call, Siegel testily confirmed the four-month figure.
Shut out of service, tech-head Alaskans will need guts to get hands on an iPhone [Anchorage Daily News] (Thanks to Eskimo Joe!)
This is a test using rich text formatting and html links. It's the generic "company" ad that should appear on all posts with the Company category if they don't have an ad attached to a specific company.
Post a comment
Comments:
@Hawk07:
Phones getting beyond WAP (the biggest fucking waste of time and effort in the history of computing) is about the only thing that could compel me to get anything above the basic 20 dollar plain white box with black lettering phone.
I think that feature is a big deal.
@OBoogie:
Yeah, considering last time I was there, you couldn't get service in half the areas their maps claimed you could. (Fairbanks was a mine field of dead zones)
@Hawk07: If you consider "working for 4 months" working.
It works. Because it roams. AT&T doesn't offer non-roaming.
I don't see why there's this huge fuss about this. I don't see people whining because they can't buy the JDM Integra Type R in the US. (why not? because it's not sold here! Duh!).
It isn't just Alaska -- Montana has the same problem (the only GSM available to locals in Montana is Chinook Wireless), as do scattered rural areas in many other states (the northern LP and the UP of Michigan, etc.)
@endless:
Now, is this a way to get out of paying the 195$ early termination fee?From what I've heard, Cingular/AT&T customers canceled for "excessive roaming" have not been charged ETFs. YMMV, of course.
Eventually, someone will unlock the phone and it'll be all over Ebay. If there is a GSM carrier in Alaska, they could buy it, unlock it and then use it on the other carrier.
Also, most phones end up at other carriers after some period of time, like 6 months.
Dude, the phone would need to make my bed and wash my dishes to make me even consider flying somewhere and going through all of this proposed effort just for a cell phone.
I'm not sure who does supply service in Alaska. My son went with Sprint (don't ask me why), got stationed in Alaska, and the roaming charges were killing him. We went to the Sprint store and told and showed the associate there that there was no service in Alaska, and he canceled the contract (what little was actually left) without any charge. We just had to pay the final bill. Yuck!
He's using Cellular One now. I think.
@CMU_Bueller: Because the $499 phone would only work for four months on AT&T's network and then wouldn't work anymore since AT&T is the ONLY group that uses GSM in America, AFAIK.
@tedyc03: TMobile is also a GSM carrier.
Re: using the 4-month roaming service cancellation as a way to get out of the contract without ETF: I wouldn't want to be the first one to try it, it wouldn't surprise me if they still wanted the ETF just for meanness, though if THEY cancel you they're probably not legally entitled to it.
Assuming that AT&T offer normal service in Alaska, but just aren't offering the iPhone there, then it would be possible to buy the phone in Washington, and swap the Washington SIM for an Alaska SIM.
The Alaska SIM would not be "roaming" so would not be cut off after 4 months (although you could buy the Alaska SIM after getting the Washington one cut off for excessive roaming)
The only way to prevent the iPhone working with a valid AT&T SIM is to blacklist it in the EIR. I think that they would be on shaky ground if they tried to do this without the phone being reported as stolen.
I would think that they won't sell it in Alaska because most of the cellphone service there is "extended coverage" area, which often limits the features you can use. So many of the iPhone's advanced features (seen on nearly every picture of the damn thing) probably wouldn't work. Would you really want to be the customer service rep at AT&T that has to explain to an angry horde of customers that their $600 phone is now basicly a shinier version of a $10 phone?
People seem to be assuming it will be possible to unlock this phone. Given apples history, do you really think they're going to make it possible to use their device in a manner they dont approve?
Dont forget, most manufacturers add the subsidy lock only for the american carriers branded phones. They're making unbranded phones too. Apple isn't making any unbranded phones and has an exclusive contract with att for 5 years. I don't think it will be so easy to get unlocked. I'm certain neither apple or att will unlock it for you.
That being said, I firmly believe that there is no security that cant be broken. There is just security that is so hard to break it's not worth the effort. I give it no more than 6 mos before we see iphones running linux.
@cac67:
"People seem to be assuming it will be possible to unlock this phone. Given apples history, do you really think they're going to make it possible to use their device in a manner they dont approve?"
Assuming the phone isn't a bust and truly becomes a must have item, I don't think it will take too long to crack.
As much as it can do, I'm sure some people will want to do more with it.
@synergy: I hear that! I wish I could take my old land line phone and just shrink it to cell phone size. Even the most basic cell phone I could buy from my provider still has some sort of "connect to the Internet" feature or texting capabilities. I just want to make a phone call! No texts, no ringer downloads, no web capabilities, just a simple phone that's a step above two cans and string.
@ShadowFalls: You must not be familiar with the well documented "Baaaaa Baaaaa" disorder which affects millions of Americans every year.
The iPhone is being touted as the new Blackberry by some, and the replacement laptop by others. It has the potential to do everything that a Mac does (music, video, pictures, internet, WP, dayplanner, games, pron) plus it's a phone. It's the new thing, but smart people have learned from the iPod not to buy apple products until the 3rd or fourth iteration.
@cac67: Ye of little faith. Make a few more comments like that on other forums and someone will take it as a timed challenge to hack the phone.
Trust me, someone will figure it out. It might even end up on here...
@LizS
Apple and AT&T have inked a five-year exclusive deal, according to blogs on the Interblart. Also, Dobson has service in Alaska, among any other local carriers, AFAIK.
@tedyc03
GSM carriers in the USA: [www.gsmworld.com] (hint: 60 live networks of various sizes)
LoL at the article photo! Me too gotta need one.
I need an iPhone so I can update my Sitka Luxury Fishing Lodge while having an Adventure Travel.













Wow, so it's not a matter of them unable to provide service up there, it's just the fact they don't want to.
I guess that fancy, whiz bang full-featured internet (as opposed to the kinda-sorta internet we're all used to) is going to tax their data streams too much.
Anyways, when has AT&T ever been for the consumer? Anytime they say something's "good for the customer" RUN LIKE A BEAR, FAST!!