Whoever Dies With The Most Logos, Wins
Logos are company's magic emblems, iconic tokens claiming territory like wolf urine. Copyranter spotted the above exemplar:
Banks love their logos. They don't just want big logos on their ads. They want HUGE fucking logos. More logos. Aesthetically pleasing meaningless logos. Here in Chase's new campaign, you have scores of shiny happy Chase logos dotting the New York metro area like cum drops. So sexy and powerful. Oh yeah, baby. More. Better. Faster.
Do the bigger logos mean there's more ATMs available at that location? Or they give you more money? Do the smaller logos conspire to take down the bigger logos and take their place? — BEN POPKEN
What the marketing director of Chase jerks off to every morning [Copyranter]
Post a comment
Comments:
I would say that I like the cum drops but that would just sound completely wrong and kinda gay. And by gay I dont mean the slang that something is stupid. I mean gay as in a man who likes cum
drops would very well potentially be gay.
I snickered. Love the crass. Dont give it up Ben, the crassness keeps me coming back.
Other than that, dont listen to them Ben. Keep on trucking eh.
BTW they really DO look like cum drops dont they?
Can I take this moment to say other naughty words? My favorite is CockSlap. Or how about AssClown or ShitMonkey. Wooo. Compound words are fun. I think I will use the word CumDrop as an insult from now on.
Hey CUMDROP! yeah I'm talking to you. you felching cumdrop.
Okay I'm done now. ;)
@Holden Caulfield: While it may be wrong, I don't care. I chuckled at your compound words. Nice to know I'm not the only one that does that.
@bokononist: or a digg style where people can vote for stories. I don't really get it. There's already a human factor filtering all the emails and tips they've getting. Voting styles are generally for random people who post random stories or random comments. Maybe they're hiring criteria needs to improve.
i don't know why this news was consumerist worthy as all companies have big logos and pictures in their ads. I mean you think someone's going to look at your ad if it has dozens of lines of text? I think this field is called marketing.
I mean if an ad was misleading or incorrect or causing consumers problems, it's consumerist worthy. But just because they have big logos... I mean come on...
I agree, Consumerist quality has gone down a lot since it's initial phase. Maybe that should be the title of the next post:
Consumerist Quality Going Down The Toilet
If you need examples of it, I can provide plenty.
@dgandy: Is it really necessary to say "HUGE fucking logos" and "cum drops" on the front page? This site is losing its credibility that it worked so hard to gain.
Not with me it isn't. The fact that the editors here can use language like that is a refreshing change from the bland, watered-down, safe-for-the-religious-right language that the conventional media uses. It's the kind of language I'd use to amuse my friends, and I appreciate the effort! And let's be real here, OK? Consumerist is a blog on the internet, for Christ's sake. It's not the New England Journal of Medicine.












This must be an off week for the Consumerist (oh god, it's only Tues!). First w/ the purina-Mother Mary non-scandal...Then the guy who is mad because he agreed to pay $100 for a reserved seat on an airplane, and now this.
Is it really necessary to say "HUGE fucking logos" and "cum drops" on the front page? This site is losing its credibility that it worked so hard to gain.
Let's get back on our A game.