Purina Cat Food Logo Rips Off Christianity
Looks like Purina took inspiration for their Premium Natural logo from Christianity's famous Madonna And Child motif.
It's not like an artist doing a "riff," or an "homage," rather, Purina is tapping into a thematic trope deeply embedded in mankind's consciousness. That's kinda creepy, weird, and funny, to boot.
Some people worship their cats so we guess it makes sense. Hey, at least Purina Natural doesn't have wheat gluten. — BEN POPKEN
(Thanks to Thomas!)
Post a comment
Comments:
See, that's what I don't like about Consumerist. This is a great and amusing story; just the kind of thing I find interesting. By why cast it as "rips off", implying some kind of nefarious intent? References, sure. Uses, even. But rips off? Maybe save that for, I don't know, when someone is actually stealing something?
@aiken: You mean you couldn't see that happening?
SCENE 1 - Nefarious Marketing Boardroom at Purina (Int)
Bob: I passed a church the other day and saw the stained glass window and suddenly felt inspired.
Karen: You're starting a Christian Rock band?
Bob: No... let's... *whispers* rip off Christianity
Karen: But.. but.. it's in the public domain!
Bob: SILENCE WOMAN! WE ARE GOING TO RIP OFF CHRISTIANITY FOR THE SAKE OF OUR KITTIES!
*bob passes around a sketch*
Joe: Dude this is totally Isis and Horus
Bob: SILENCE!!!
Also with Aiken.
The sensationalist headline "Rips of Christianity" is silly and overblown. One could just as easily posit the opposite, that Purina is part of a Christian conspiracy to inject christianity into all aspects of our lives, even our pet food. Neither idea is actually justified. All art is derivative to some degree or another.
@danieldavis: Me too. Big, fat happy man surrounded by beatific kitties. I'd choose that food over all others.
I think the headline was intended kind of tongue and cheek, It's kind of hard to rip off the whole freaking religion. If they meant it as anything other than "hey look... this kinda looks like that" they would have said "Purina rips off Michelangelo (not the ninja turtle)".
p.s... I know it's clearly not a Michelangelo painting, in fact it looks like that particular one is a fake: http://www.newyorkology.com/archives/2006/07/art_historian...
Hey, I thought it was a funny story. I was just saying that, as much as I like Consumerist, I'm a little fatigued with the "this is an OUTRAGE" headline writing style that they apply to some fairly innocuous stories.
Heck, just in the past day or so we've had this silly "rip off", Toyota taken to task for renting a car that they didn't actually rent, and a Quiznos "infested" by one coyote.
Cat food packaging that borrows a well-known graphic motif from Christian and other religious artworks doesn't merit the same level of outrage as, say, the guy who was stranded in europe and whose bank told him to get lost.
It's boy-who-cried-wolf syndrome, and it diminishes the stories that actually deserve strong feelings.














Im waiting for the buddist version.