I predict an increase in the proportion of people who get airsick. Facing backwards when a vehicle is accelerating or decelerating feels very weird.

There needs to be a "I'm not sure, I'd need to try it out first" option.

The awkwardness of sitting askew to someone might keep idiots sitting next to me from starting a conversation. This will likely only last six months though.

Also: screw front-back legroom! I need more side to side legroom!

God, I hate when I sit in a facing seat on public transportation, I always have a hard time avoiding eye contact with the person in front of me, especially if it's fairly tight spacing. I can't fathom a multiple hour flight like that.

It may be safer to face backwards, but its kinda hard to share space with your wife if you are facing different directions.

Maybe its if you are by yourself, but still getting up to go to the bath room means that you pretty much have to disturb everyone around you.

Southwest already has this on some of their fleet. My answer to this and many other similar situations: Bring a book.

I agree with segfault on the airsickness issue, but here is another issue. What do you do when you're in the middle and the aisle passengers fall asleep reclined all the way back? I can't see this trend being successful

Later,
Chrome...

@segfault: Like me... I used to get queasy when I had to ride backwards on the commuter train.

If I'm staring into a book or at a computer screen, it's not the other person.

can someone explain to me how this fits more people in the plane while giving them more leg room? all you are doing is flipping a seat around....i don't see how this saves space except for the couple inches that is wasted at the tail and the wall between first and coach.

Yeah, I'd get horribly airsick if I had to fly backwards. Like MercuryPDX, I get sick riding backwards on the train.

I think it'll put an interesting element into the battle for the armrest. Not only can you see the guy's face, instead of bumping arms, you're playing a game of 'Handsies'. Definately not cool.

Wow,

someone most likely making 6 figures came up with this idea which may be a scientifically viable way to increase "headcout", but the practicality of this lacks any common sense. If you were sitting in the backwards facing seat and the folks you were "splitting" were siblings or spouses, how akward would this be or how anoying.

@moorie679:
It doesn't increase any legroom at all. It basically saves side to side space in that they can allow the shoulder areas to stick out a bit and over lap each other. Which makes it an even fiercer battle for the coveted arm rest.

Lol to all you who get airsick flying facing forward. Imagine flying on a military jet facing backwards the whole way from Frankfurt, Germany all the way to Dover, Deleware? Been there done that it sucks, I never liked facing backwards but at least on Southwest you get windows to look out of.

Southwest used to do it. THey don't anymore. For a reason.

A lot of people don't like backwards seats.

Oh thank god. This will make all the hardcore mid-air make out sessions so much EASIER.

But seriously, I'm only OK with this if the person facing me isn't ugly. But they probably will be.

What I want to know is how I will discreetly pick my boogers when the person is making eyes at me. I know I'm hot. But I need some me time when I'm traveling too.

What the hell?? Im at a loss for words. Though I guess those blinders on the side of the head rests might reduce eye contact a bit. I think that seating arrangement would pop my personal space bubble.

It is safer (that's why many military aircraft do this) but I had to vote no because I'm not comfortable with the idea unless a limited number of facing seats are installed and you reserve them in pairs (e.g. are travelling with someone you know).

when we fly with our kids, we take up 6 seats.
The wife and I purposely sit between 2 children so that we can hog their unsued space.
This kind of seating arrangement might be bad for family travel.

why not horizontal bunk beds? you could cram even more people in and everyone would be super comfy?

Since the airlines clearly care much more about cramming as many people in as possible than about passengers' comfort or well-being, why not just hang everyone on meat hooks?

bbici may be on to something, how about Fifth Element / Japanese sleeping tubes? If it gave more legroom (doubtful) I'd be all for it -- anyone over 5'9" is almost guarenteed to be uncomfortable flying coach.

@jamesdenver and nweaver: My understanding is that the FAA banned backward seats on US-registered airliners for safety reasons. Given that, it's hard to imagine domestic airlines doing anything like this...but I could see some European and Asian airlines doing it "just because".

I'm for Sleeping Tubes!

The Times article includes this tidbit:

"He admitted that tests had shown that some passengers might feel uncomfortable with being able to establish eye contact with neighbours. So the company has added a privacy screen at eye level that is pulled out from the seat in front."

Is anyone else having trouble picturing this "privacy screen"? Is it going to be like a cone of silence?

ooh i can't wait to sit backwards, with no extra leg room! what i'm really excited about is the kid yanking on my arm hairs and then hiding behind the edge of the chair... heehee, peek-a-boo i see you.

I was thinking this might be good for the better half and I, we can face each other and talk...

But then again we fight a lot and eye contact would probably make things worse :)

And eye contact with Boy George or some smelly meathead wouldn't be all that cool either.

Thank god I don't have to fly all that much!

Add my vote to the capsule hotel idea! There's not much to do on an airplane to begin with: sleep, booze, watch a shitty movie, or try to increase one's miles at the mile high club with the 20-something stewardess in the restroom. If the last option is unavailable (is it me or are the stewardesses not quite as hot as they used to be?), sleep would be my preferred way to kill the time, especially on international flights.

Missing from the poll: D) Hell no, the airlines are cramming too many people in the tiny tin cans to begin with. Let's get some customer service going first before we think of ways to fit more sardines in the can.

Also, the only way I would fly backwards is if there was a shoulder harness (like the jump seats). Even a rough landing while sitting backwards with your torso unsupported could = pain.

Um, since the idea is about additional revenue for airlines, shouldn't the pool have an "...if it lowers ticket prices by 20%" type option? I mean, who in their right mind is going to vote for "sure, I want to pay the same thing and have this new and awkward seating arrangement"?

Nothing new with this. British Airways has had a configuration like this in Business Class for years. I actually always preferred their backwards seats in business class, for some reason the takeoff and landing was much more comfortable.

I have been authorized by the staff to break in with the following announcement. The Consumerist Forums have been created and we are releasing this info in a limited capacity for now. Visit: http://consumerist.proboards88.com if you want to be one of the first to witness this new chapter in Consumerist history!

Personally, I'm against any idea that crams even more people into steerage. It's already prohibitively expensive for me to fly unless it's an absolute necessity, and you know they're not going to lower fares. It doesn't have to be increasingly miserable at roughly the same rate as it's increasingly unaffordable.

I've flown facing backwards on Southwest and it doesn't bother me in the least. I'm fine with it.

I'm a tall guy, so there's one good thing about this arrangement for me if there's more leg room- no more squished knees as the passenger in front of me leans back. By the way, am I the only one who never leans my seat back because I pity whoever's behind me, and I know exactly what it's like to have your legroom go from limited to 0? Sleeping tubes would be very nice. I never get airsick, so I don't think backwards seats would effect me in that respect. However... I bet if they carried out this idea they wouldn't lower the fare, and increased leg room would be anywhere from minimal to a figment of your imagination. There will just be more people on the plane. And you know what more people on the plane means? That's right! Longer lines and longer waits. Eventually there will be "standing room only" on these planes...

In all my years of flying I've sat next to someone I'd want to be facing once. The only advantage to this arrangement is if you're seated next to someone who, shall we say, "overflows" their seat. Another disadvantage I don't think anyone mentioned is that you can't stretch out across more than one seat on those rare occasions when you have an empty seat next to you.

you know the human body can stand 2x the amount of force when sitting backwards in a crash as opposed to sitting forwards?

Sitting backwards is safer....
http://www.mailtribune.com/archive/2001/august/080501n1.ht...

Maybe they should just have us all doped on sleeping gas when we go on a flight, like in the Fith Element. Save on hijackings and things. Then you could just pile sleeping people ontop of each other on the plane with no worries...Just one large stack of passengers...

Like many of you posters I too have gone backwards, it is not fun and I do not recommend it.

I voted for the first option. No way in hell I would ever fly a configuration like this.

So I can't leave my bag under my feet because the area must be clear for safety reasons, but having to climb over an entire seat thats facing the other way is ok?

Huh?

reg

@urban_ninjya: yeah i guessed as much... thank you for clearing it up and may the gods of the armrest shine upon thee the next time you board a plane.

Ps: Better get ready to have a couple kids every time you board a plane considering that eventually they will put people so close together some are bound to get pregnant.

aside from the obvious creep factor as described in option a, where is this supposed extra leg room entering the picture? all you're gonna get is the ability to intertwine with the people facing you instead of rubbing legs parallel style, and/or play footsie with someone who's sexy eyebrows indicate they probably don't want to.

How does the window seat get coffee?

I don't like them for the fact that emergency evacuations would be a mess. Consider that if those seats were reclined at all, in different directions, it would make a safe evac very tough. That, and imagine the window seat pax trying to get through the middle and aisle seats while reclined.

If they put me in that middle seat, I guarantee I will barf.

In the late 60's and early 70's; Mohawk Airlines flew BAC 111 planes with rear facing seats.

@superlayne: Definitely love the sleeping boxes :) I was thinking the same thing and hoping no one mentioned it yet. It'd be the best thing ever, no need to struggle on a 15 hour flight overseas. Economy, I mean ghetto class, sucks major ass. Hell they don't even give you peanuts anymore. Domestic flights here are so damn cheap, and not in the inexpensive way. They make you pay 5 dollars for booze, which is usually shitty. Midwest has a shitty wine with a fish on the label and is 5 dollars. Dumb white people buy it, and I feel bad for them.

I have no problem with this. Unless I'm staring at some ayhole for 16 hours. That's awkward.

So what happens to the "fat" people who have to buy two seats?