Charmin Rolls Out Shorter Ultra Big Rolls
Charmin Ultra Big Rolls have shrunk by 1 centimeter, but don't expect the price to drop anytime soon. The discoverer of the change has an interesting take on the smaller Ultra Big rolls:
The fabulous news here, obviously, is that America's collective butt is getting smaller, and the folks at Proctor & Gamble are merely keeping pace. They've narrowed the width of Charmin, the veritable Rolls Royce of Toilet Paper, purely in response to our nation's decreasing posteriors.Charmin offers a shitty explanation in their FAQ:The previous paragraph, of course, is an outright lie. Well, except for the part about Charmin being the Rolls Royce (pun intended) of TP; I think that's really the case. What's really happening here is the more cunning sort of inflation: I can't say for sure, but I bet the price of Charmin hasn't dropped in accordance with the size of the rolls.
Q. I noticed a difference in the size of my Charmin rolls. What is different about them and why?You don't just buy sheets. You buy area, measured by length and width. Last week it was Cadbury, this week it's Charmin. We wonder what will shrink next week... — CAREY GREENBERG-BERGER
A. We've reduced the width of the Charmin roll. However, each roll still has the same number of sheets.
Charmin Shrinks With Exposure to Air, Bush Economy [Money Musings] (Thanks to Jim!)
Post a comment
Comments:
.....Northern is better, anyway. I wouldn't have agreed with meal shrinkage (Outback) when I was a teenager, but I do decades later! (Those were the days of being able to eat a 32 oz. porterhouse!) It's rare when I eat at a sit-down place that I don't take a box of leftovers home. If I don't, it means the food was lousy!
.....Outback's bloomin' onion is an awesome treat, but frankly, their steaks are very average. (It's actually pretty hard to mess up a steak). Outback puts too much red pepper on the thing, and there's no charcoal or hickory taste. Bleh. Sad fact is that anyone with a bag of Kingsford and a closed grill can blow most steakhouses away at home!
I seriously doubt your ass is going to be any stinkier with 2cm less wide toilet paper. all this does is save paper (hello, REDUCE is the first of the three 'R' of sustainability!). get over it.
and you're still on about the cabury thing? dude they list the grams on the packaging, theres no mystery there! full transparency.
Well, at least the roll will finally fit on my Ikea TP holders, which were apparently designed to hold metric TP rolls and are a half-inch too narrow.
They've obviously taken a clue from the food industry where, for example, I've noticed "half-gallons" of ice-cream have shrunk to 1.75 quarts. If you eat 1.75 quarts of ice cream instead of a half-gallon..that's 12.5% less, and if input=output...well..you know where I'm going with this.
@zentec:
That's why I stopped going to outback. They used to give you good sized portions for the price. The last year or more, the portions are very small, but the same price. Definitely not worth it.
Why -adverb
1. for what? for what reason, cause, or purpose?
Source:dictionary.com
Somebody at Charmin just failed first grade English.
Seriously though, they can just say that TP-making cost more nowadays and they did this to avoid jacking up prices. We understand.
In protest against this industry, I'm boycotting all toliet paper!
We're all so uptight these days that our target spot is shrinking as our self-righteous asses continue to pucker. Charmin knows this and adjusted accordingly. Lowering prices would only encourage higher usage and the destruction of more trees. Think of it as a bio-carbon offset. Now relax and have a smooth one.
there's two ways of seeing this:
1: the company is trying to save paper
2: the company is trying to get more profit. i'm not math guy but cutting out 1cm will actually add up to a lot in the long run. it's like that story about that airline that removed one olive from their martini and saved them thousands.
however, since they are a company, they probably did it save tons and tons of money.
i just measured a random sheet of toilet paper. it's 11.43 x 10.16 cm. that's 116 cm squared (i rounded down).
so we remove 1 cm from the width, it's 10.43 x 10.16. that's 106 cm squared (rounded up).
that's an 8% reduction in size. so a roll of 1000 with the 8% reduction is missing 80 sheets...
@lonelymaytagguy: Yeah, and that same asshole measured the graduations for my Mr. Coffee machine, which claims to be 4 cups, but is really four 5-ounce cups, and thus 20 oz. Great for how I use it (just me filling a 14 oz mug), but I can't make coffee for two people at the same time in it. Jerks.
I reported this back in September in a comment on this very blog. Glad to see you've finally caught up. :)
http://consumerist.com/consumer/mayo/wheres-the-mayo-19845...
@FLConsumer: Well, your typical American doesn't practice ATM, so I don't think it's that big an issue, whereas your hands make contact with your face several times a day.
I thought consumerist was for people who want to consume more intelligently, not simply more.
I think toilet paper is a fine size. I thought cadbury eggs were too large when I was a child. Now that child obesity has taken off and everyone's talking about the amount of waste we produce, I have to ask....
Isn't this GOOD news?!?












This is unfortunately the norm with corporations. They are loathe to be seen increasing prices, so they simply cut back on the product hoping no one notices.
Or, they change the formulation for the product and call it "concentrated", knowing full well that the consumer will simply use more than they need to resulting in not only the same profit, but more sales.
I was dragged out to dinner last night at Outback. Not my favorite place, but the consensus among the group was that was choice. I noticed that their salads have shrunk considerably, as well as the portions on the entree everyone ordered.