McDonald's McFights McLanguage in McDictionary
Language is power, and Ronald McDonald is getting into a pissing match with the guardians of the English language.
McDonald's Corp. on Tuesday restarted its push to get the word "McJob" removed from dictionaries -- and has set its sights on the gold standard of lexicons, the Oxford English Dictionary.
Glad to see the legal department at Mickey D's HQ is working overtime. They might also want to target the OED's definition of the prefix "Mc," which applies "chiefly to nouns to form nouns with the sense 'something that is of mass appeal, a standardized or bland variety.'"
As I type this, I'm wondering if the corporate goons have already found success: McDonald's will be happy to know that Firefox's spell-checker doesn't recognize the word "McJob." Then again, it doesn't recognize "Hamburglar," either. So let's call it a draw. — MARK ASHLEY
McDonald's Targets the English McLanguage [Spiegel Online International]
(Photo: iboy_daniel)
This is a test using rich text formatting and html links. It's the generic "company" ad that should appear on all posts with the Company category if they don't have an ad attached to a specific company.
Post a comment
Comments:
Can you please get me a kleenex? (vs. tissue)
I'm going down the hall to xerox something. (on a copier that's not necessarily a Xerox).
I googled him (on Yahoo).
Somebody stole my iPod (or other mp3 player not necessarily made by Apple).
See, McDonald's? There are lots of brand names and trademarks that work their way into day-to-day language.
McD's is just pissed because the connotations of words like "McJob" or "McMansion" are negative.
McJob is slang for a low-paying, low-prestige job that requires few skills and offers very little chance of intracompany advancement.
I am so going to use this word more often.
The problem is, McJob has been around for such a long time, and yet I never hear anyone use the term. If dictionaries are supposed to support the vernacular (hence the odious addition of the nuclear pronounciation noo kyoo ler - thanks G-Dub) and people don't use it, I don't see why there's any problem with it being pulled.
The problem, from McDonalds' point of view, is that they have to aggressively pursue "violations" of the name to keep it from passing into common usage. If it becomes common usage (like the word "aspirin" did, for example) then they can no longer defend the trademark. If at some point in the future they decide to take someone to court for, say, opening another fast food restaurant called "McDonald's," the court is going to look at things like whether other people have also used the name, and whether McDonald's bothered to go after those other people.
For the record, IANAL, just a linguist.
@GenXCub: Funny enough GenXCub, I first learned the word, 'McJob' from Douglas Coupland's 'Generation X' back in the 90's.
The prefix Mc- denotes a fast food company, huh? That's funny, we Irish-Americans (and most likely the native Irish too) think of it as reflecting our heritage and culture (I've got two Mc-'s in my name). But to be fair, we've only been using it for a few centuries and didn't think to register it with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (CrapDonald's is smarter than us on that, I guess.) If the prefix Mc- belongs to anyone, it's us. Thanks for bastardizing it, Roy Kroft, et al.
Joss Whedon, the creator of "Buffy the Vampire Slayer," once mentioned in an interview that in seven years of plots involving every kind of monster, violence and death, the only serious pushback they ever got was in season six, when Buffy worked for a fast food restaurant. No, really. The network got so much pressure from McDonalds that they had to actually write the job off the show.
And not because the restaurant itself was disgusting. No, the problem was that Buffy clearly hated working there and regarded it as a soul-sucking waste of her life. THAT was McDonald's big problem with the plot line.
Newsflash: If you want people to think that your business is an awesome place work, make it an awesome place to work. You'll notice that Costco and The Container Store don't have people snarking about their working conditions. Huh, I wonder why that is?
I agree with you Katewrath. If they're upset about it being a negative connotation, then start paying the workers $10 an hour and stop suing others for using the "Mc" prefix. Their legal actions have finally caught up with them and they're going to have to start making positive changes. If anything, this news makes me want to start using the word more often.
Does McDonald's understand what a Dictionary is? You can't have a 'campaign' to have a word removed from it. They've got to be kidding if they think the OED can be pressured into removing it. If a word has become part of the english language, it gets into the dictionary, you can't legislate to have it removed.
Roger Shuy over at academic uberblog Language Log has been mocking this for the better part of a year:
http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/003670...
http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/004324...
MY question to them is how would they define it?
A fullfilling career with exelent prospects? That wouldn't really be the way people are using the word now is it? Might as well change the definition of the word crap to sound like food so they don't feel so bad serving it. Doesn't change what it realy is though.
This is is not the first time that McDonald's has done this, and it's certainly not the first time a large organization has tried to. Potato farmers, for example, tried to clean up the "couch potato."
What's next? Will they try to ban the Horace Silver song, "Filthy McNasty"?
The title is actually a pretty good description of their "food".
"She is poisoning the world with her hamburgers, and we can't even get a lousy beer."
- Goose Gossage, former pitcher of the San Diego Padres (when it was owned by Joan Kroc, widow of McDonald's founder Ray Kroc). Gossage was suspended without pay until he apologized.
.
(And to The Consumerist site owner, sorry for sending this a second time if you chose not to post it the first time. I post this again because I thought it was a login problem, and not done to spam you.)






















Um, doesn't the dictionary record what words are being used in a language? It's not like they made this up.