A Closer Look At Comcast's Privacy Policy
Wired took a closer look at Comcast's privacy policy on one of their blogs today. Of particular interest:
The privacy policy starts off with the fine sentiment that: "Comcast is committed to maintaining your privacy and believes that, as a subscriber to its high-speed Internet service, you are entitled to know Comcast's information practices." The policy then goes on to state "We will not read your outgoing or incoming e-mail, video mail, private chat, or instant messages, but we (or our third party providers) do store e-mail messages and video mail messages on computer systems for a period of time."Comcast (and we're sure they're not alone in this) should really be more explicit about what is captured and how long it is stored. —MEGHANN MARCO"A period of time" is not defined.
Comcast Deflects User's Questions - Updated [Wired]
(Photo: cmorran123)
This is a test using rich text formatting and html links. It's the generic "company" ad that should appear on all posts with the Company category if they don't have an ad attached to a specific company.
Post a comment
Comments:
Ha hawkins, you beat me to it. I totally thought the same thing when I read this in my google reader this morning.
Store-and-forward is used almost everywhere on the Internet, because without it, a lot of routing would not work. Additionally, the store-and-forward parameters of infrastructure are typically not let out to the public for security reasons. If you knew how long the timeout was on a router, you could abuse that and disrupt it. Security through obscurity is never a good idea, but it's better than nothing.
Lastly, if store-and-forward wasn't used on email (and other types of "multimedia" email), there is significantly less guarantee of delivery. This situation is analogous to the risk of moving a file as opposed to copying, and then deleting the original upon successful arrival.
I believe this policy is par for the course. But if you would like to get your conspiracy knickers in a knot read this about Gmail.
This annoys me in the sense that the library system feels the need to reassure you that they don't keep records so it won't do Homeland Security any good to ask for records. I'd rather they keep records so when I can't remember that book I read, they might give me a list. The problem is that the government shouldn't be able to ask for it without permission. Nor should security against others/hackers be a problem.
I wouldn't trust them. After they disconnected me from the internet I started looking into what else the company has been involved with. Seems in 2002 they did something that violated the telecommunications privacy act of 1984 but I don't know what the results where.
http://news.zdnet.com/2100-1009_22-923285.html
I wouldn't trust these guys. They will do what they feel like and the customer be damned. What arrogance. At this point I'm pushing for Net Neutrality and fiber to the house. Time to out grown copper and go fiber :D
(http://comcastissue.blogspot.com)





I don't think that's the scary part. Most e-mail systems work by "store-and-forward": your outbound messages are uploaded to your ISP's mail server, where they sit until the mail server dispatches them. Your inbound mail sits on the mail server until you fetch it.
So all e-mail messages are stored "for a period of time."
Other parts of the agreement are much more shocking, like where Comcast claims copyright ownership of anything you e-mail to anybody, ever.