Starbucks Baristas Outraged That Customers Have Wised Up
Starbuck's smug distributors of sweet, caffeinated crude have pulled their panties clear over their head in one outraged jerk after their customers have learned to save a couple pucks on an iced espresso.
It works like this. At Starbucks, three shots of expresso over ice will set you back a couple bucks. If you want it as an iced espresso latte, though, the milk will cost you $3.50.
So what are people doing? Just ordering the former and filling up with milk from the side bar.
Makes sense to me, but Starbucks barrista's are exploding into vapor clouds of spittle over it. Claimed one Barista, "You're being cheap... I'll bet you didn't ask for a discount on that Louis Vuitton purse or those ugly highlights." A coffee shop manager of another chain said of the baristas' hysteria: "No one wants to be taken advantage of... the baristas get offended."
Yeah, that's right. No one likes to be taken advantage of. Like, for example, paying an extra 2 bucks for 5 cents worth of milk.
Baristas are having a cow over dairy "thefts" [Seattle Times]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. In ornare magna et est porta et mattis lorem tristique. Mauris ultricies tortor a augue eleifend Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. In ornare magna et est porta et mattis lorem tristique. Mauris ultricies tortor a augue eleifendLorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. In ornare magna et est porta et mattis lorem tristique. Mauris ultricies tortor a augue eleifend
Post a comment
Comments:
This is what I usually do when I want an iced espresso -- though I want way more espresso than milk, so it's not really an "iced espresso latte".
As to the quality of the condiment cream... when I worked coffee, it was a very rare thing indeed for the cream/milk to be warm at all. The pitchers that the condiments are kept in are well insulated and have to be tested periodically to make sure that they're keeping the milk at an appropriate texture. (I didn't work for Starbucks, so I don't know if/how they differ -- but this was a health code thing as well as a quality control thing, so I can't imagine it would be any different.) And I think that any customer that pours "chunky warm milk" into their espresso is going to be complaining on the spot... that's something you notice right away.
I don't think customers are "taking advantage of" baristas -- maybe they're taking advantage of the pricing system, but if that's the case then Starbucks needs to decide at the corporate level to just not offer cream on the condiment bar. This customer practice isn't cutting into stores' profit margins.
I love, LOVE the outrage.
"We're willing to screw our customers for every penny we possibly can, up to and including treating them like dead mice we found in our underwear drawer, BUT HOW DARE THEY take advantage of a loophole in our rules? How dare they??"
This isn't just Starbucks of course. It's every company that I no longer feel the slightest moral twinge about getting absolutely everything I can out of -- and that's a lot of companies.
If you screw your customers, they will screw back. There's another t-shirt for later. ;)
I have to say something great about a Starbucks barista: I used to always order a small dry cappucino. My regular barista told me that I could order an espresso doppio machiato for less money and get more exactly what I wanted! Not that all stores are experts at making this drink (which can end up like a small wet cappucino which might not be a bad thing for some people!). Also, I learned (here maybe?) that all the caps have the same amount of espresso (unless you order another shot) so the difference in those sizes is just milk! And I learned (here?) to order "small"!
I see where this is going - Starbucks takes the milk off the condiment bar and now those of us just grabbing a cup of coffee have to get the barista to dole it out to us drop by drop, that is, if we can even get their attention.
Isn't all of this just the same as the person who takes 100 sugar packets and a handful of napkins and puts them in their purse?
Can someone say tempest in a teapot?
If you don't like the way Starbucks does business, shop somewhere else. Thankfully, we still have some alternatives in the overpriced coffee outlets, unlike, say, cable, eletric, gas, or telephone.
While this is absolutely a consumerist issue, I think it should be an issue because of how silly the whole topic is, not because one side or another is getting ripped off.
Dustin writes:
"I drink iced coffee and my favorite place to get it is Starbucks. However, I don't order Iced Coffee because I get more for less by ordering a hot coffee with ice on the side. My official order is "TallCoffeeNoRoomVentiCupOfIce" and it costs $1.50. Then I walk over to the coffee bar and dump the hot coffee into the cold ice. It always reaches the top of the plastic Venti cup. I throw the hot coffee cup away and I'm done. I saved 30 cents (I think an iced shaken coffee, Venti, is $1.80) and got fresher coffee, too. ."
When I go to Starbuck's, I always order a regular coffee with lots of space at the top for milk. I do this not because it's cheaper than ordering a latte (although it is), but because I don't like my coffee very hot, and adding cold milk myself (rather than getting the hot steamed milk in a latte) cools it down.
I have to say that the baristas have never given me a problem with this. In fact, in some occasions they've given me a larger-size cup while charging me for the smaller one I ordered, because they're not filling it all the way up with coffee.
Maybe the problem isn't with Starbucks at all, but with snooty Seattle baristas who are mad that their poetry, rock band or job application at Peet's never went anywhere.
I have never ever worked at Starbucks. I have however worked at one of our locally owned coffee shops that I still frequent daily.
We also had a pretty regular customer who would order a 16oz americano, ask for an inch of water and ask us to "top it off" with steamed milk.
The "topping off" ended up being 3/4 of the volume of the cup.
I think many of you are missing a point.
Her behaviour and those mentioned in the post is not clever or noble. The behaviour is trying to get something for nothing, which is something pretty damning when a corporation does it, are we supposed to applaud it when an individual does it?
Sure Starbucks is a big chain with big pockets, but it is just as WRONG to do it to a big corporation as it is to the small mom&pop coffee shop. If you don't like Starbucks then don't buy from them, but it not appropriate to try and screw them over.
Part of the expectation of being treated fairly as a customer is to be a GOOD customer, not a petty criminal.
Remember that the cost of a latte is not just milk and coffee beans. It's rent, training, machine repairs, machine maintance, electricity bills, insurance, hourly wages, and the 1001 little things that most people don't see going on that this little scam avoids supporting so that they can feel superior by saving a $1.75 and looking like an idiot in front of people.
I should add that I think Starbucks over-roasts their coffee, charges to much for it, and has relies to heavily on rote training instead of good espresso theory. In general Starbucks sucks... but from technical standpoint.
*Oh, and the lady I mentioned, when the manager finally said to her "If you are going to ask for steamed milk we are going to have to start charging you latte prices." she poured her full cup on his shoes and walked out. IS that the sort of person you would want to be remembered as?
It's ridiculous that a customer should be pressured to provide any tip for a product which costs the store $0.25 and which they sell for $4. These baristas should be kissing the butts of the customers they're ripping off instead of attacking the customers for trying not to get ripped off as badly as normal.
I worked at Starbucks in college, and I was neither self-important nor snobbish. Starbucks doesn't neccessarily treat their employees that well, so that "barista 'tude" might not be all about you.
I'm of two minds about the whole "tipping your barista" thing, but I do have to say that people come in with ridiculous demands that you see parodied but are very real "halfcafskim180degreelightfoaminagrandecupwithtwosweetandlowsandanextrashot" are the norm. If you are asking someone who makes 8 bucks an hour (in New York City) to put that much effort and thought in to what should be a simple transaction, they deserve a tip, even if it's scraps. And Starbucks employees are taxed for their tips on their paycheck, btw.
Also, while I don't think Starbucks should be charging that much for an iced drink (they really are half ice), I also think that people who drink coffee at Starbucks are clearly okay with disposing of their income in a frivolous way, so it's not like that extra buck for something that hasn't been sitting out all day is gonna really break the bank if you were paying that much to begin with.
Chris V., you completely miss the point.
Yes, the company (Starbucks in this instance) provides .25 for the ingredients of the coffee, but that's not who you're tipping. All of the overhead directly affects the price of the drink, and just like Leareth pointed out, there are a lot more things that go into that cup than just the beans and water.
By not tipping the workers, you are screwing them over twice. A) on the tip that they deserve as part of standard custom in a service economy and B) on the taxes that they are paying on the (in your case) non-existent tip.
Screw the corporation all you want, but these are the front line workers who deserve all of our support for needing to be wage slaves to Starbucks. Grow up, and give them a dime at least.


















I wonder if these guys know how long the milk has been sitting out for. It's supposed to be changed every hour, but things get busy.
Adding that chunky warm milk that anyone could have sneezed on/poured all the sugars into/drank from the pitcher sounds the perfect way to top up a gross robotic espresso shot. And yes, I've seen all three of those happen.