This ad is an ad for this ad.
Visa + “Protection” + “Sucker” + “Happy Endings” + “Fat Chick” = “Innuendo”
(Thanks to Chris V!)
Want Consumerist in your inbox? We will not sell or rent your email
This ad is an ad for this ad.
Visa + “Protection” + “Sucker” + “Happy Endings” + “Fat Chick” = “Innuendo”
(Thanks to Chris V!)
More Online Ads Should Require Users To Confirm They Meant To Click
Scratch & Sniff Internet Ad Technology Has A Long Way To Go
Best Buy Website Runs Ads For Competing Websites
Facebook Really Wants To Be Hated, Will Launch Auto-Play Video Ads In 2013
Facebook Takes Big Step Backward Toward Traditional Advertising
Proudly powered by WordPress · Theme: Modern News by StudioPress.
So what’s with your occasional “fat chick” digs? I enjoy the scorn you dish to shifty businesses and the knowledge you provide, but am beginning to think maybe it’s not worth it at the cost of seeing chicks like myself mocked. I know it’s your place and I can read elsewhere, but I thought I’d ask before making that decision.
Fat chick+layers=bad dressing
I don’t get the ‘I just thought someone was buying everyone drinks’ one.