UPDATE: Gazonga Outrages BabyTalk Readers
Zulkey agrees with the outrage over a giant breast gracing the cover of BabyTalk.
"Nobody should be forced to see something so disgusting and sexual. I prefer that the boobies on my magazine covers come the natural, Christian way. That is, kind of covered:"
Examples of the more acceptable ways to show breasts on magazine covers follow.
Consumers upset over the display of breasts on their free magazine have a variety of proactive options to choose, including from averting their eyes, writing letters of complaint, and moving to Afghanistan. After all, there's no use crying over spilled milk.
Post a comment
Comments:
@ Papercutninja, I should probably clarify that my remarks were not both about your question. That people are stupid has to do with the notion that Amy Alkon's a closet pedophile (and with oh, so many other things, but I'm sure that's a given). As far as Adam's cock is concerned, I was just being flip.
But while I'm at it, James, why can we talk freely about breasts but not cocks? Now we're getting into a sexist area...






Looks like an elbow to me. :-(