Outsidepride.com. A URL worthy of a gay pride parading society. But no, don’t mistake them for part of the Rainbow Brigade! OutsidePride.com is a seed and lawn care retailer, and, in fact, they hate those damn homos.
Adam P. sent us a remarkable rant from the president of Outside Pride. He sent a homophobic manifesto to the participants of his company’s email list, trying to rally them in a full-on campaign against what Adam P. pricelessly refers to as “the whole CBS homosexual cartel” — Cold Case and Without a Trace, among others.
Troy Hake, the president of Outside Pride, and his astonishing anti-gay rant, after the jump.
This is not your typical newsletter from Outsidepride.com, Inc. In fact, this is the first one in six years which is not business related. I apologize for cluttering your inbox with an unsolicited email; however you are free to unsubscribe just by clicking the link at the bottom.
I want to share with you my television viewing experience the other night on prime time television. I ask those of you who agree with me to go to http://www.cbs.com and go to the bottom of the page, click the feedback link and express your opinion. I know the vast majority of you will agree with me as all polls indicate. We are the majority, not the minority as the liberal media would lead you to believe.
My wife and I sat down to watch television the other night with our children. Cold Case was on which is normally a fairly enjoyable show to watch; however, the last half hour of the show dealt with a young man who wished he had asked his male friend to come with him (long story short). The show ended with the two men hugging and obvious intimation they had discovered their gay feelings towards each other. The very next show was Without A Trace. The whole last half hour of this show was about two lesbians who were struggling with their feelings of lesbianism. It ended with full acceptance from one father and the two lesbians making out. Yes, they were kissing right at the end of the show on public prime time television. So much for wholesome family television.
Now, I am NOT trying to bash homosexuals and I am not a bigot; however, I feel homosexuality is morally wrong and should not be “promoted” as what is the norm for society. Text books are being rewritten as I am writing this to “highlight” every homosexual who has made a contribution to society. There are teachers who have been asked to make sure students know that, “This person in history was a homosexual.” History is being rewritten to promote homosexuality and prime time television is doing its best to make homosexuality a “normal” behavior. If homosexuality was the norm, civilization would have ceased to exist thousands of years ago. Procreation takes a man and a woman. There was Adam and then there was Eve, not Adam and Steve.
There are literally tens of thousand of you reading this email right now. If you are tired of the way public television is going let CBS know! It will only take about 1 minute of your time. Again, just go to http://www.cbs.com and click the feedback link at the bottom. It is time the majority speak up and not let the minority run this country. The majority can bring back the Christian heritage this country was founded on because it is, “In God We Trust.”
Thank you for your time,
Troy Hake
President
Outsidepride.com, Inc.
More From Consumerist
-
Galaxy S3 Owner Pens Love Letter To His Phone, Gets Samsung CEO To Pay For Out-Of-Warranty Repair
-
Masco Cabinetry Takes Over Support For Closed Company, Replaces Their Crappy Cabinet Doors For Free
-
Berating A Chick Fil-A Employee On Video Is Not A Good Way To Get Your Point Across
-
5 Examples Why Just About Everyone Hates Debt Collectors
-
Bank Of America’s House Winterizing Crew Results In A Missing Muscle Car
Thank you. When you quoted the number earlier it seemed low to me especially since the little tv I do watch these days is on cable but now that I know the context I understand it.
it.goes.there-I think most people would agree that your insinuations that gay people are a superior demographic because they don’t have “those pesky kids and tithes to drain their disposable income” is an insulting and wrong one.
Furthermore, your declaration of “excuse me while I go buy another Louis V…bag” is both pompous and foolish, as though to say that only gay people could afford luxury items. And this is to say nothing of your obviously insulting language referring to my statement as “wrong and only an idiot would believe such a thing, and I have faith your not such an idiot.”
You use doublespeak like the best of em, it/goes.there, but don’t think you can get away with it with me. You’re a petty and insecure person, and you’ve managed to take these posts out of the context of the article with your rantings.
Petty – yes. Insecure – no.
I never insinuated anything, and if you read more into what I said, I can do nothing to help that. If I wanted to insult you I’d come right out and do that; on the internet, the social mores that demand subtlety and “doublespeak” don’t come into play like they would if I actually knew you.
As far as the gay demographic being superior, that’s a subjective value call. All I said (and this is true) is that gays on the whole have more disposable income than their heterosexual counterparts, due to fewer ties with family and other schemes such as religion that tend to snare a greater percentage of heteros than homos. I’m not saying we are or are not a better demographic, but certainly it is a short jump for a marketer to see “more disposable income = better group towards which we should cater our offerings.”
I don’t know why you say I’m getting emotional and ranting. I have no personal investment in the outcome of this discussion; if you continue to be wrong (or to bandy about willfully ignorant statements, since I really do find it hard to believe that anyone clever enough to operate a computer can believe that our country is based on an easy “majority rules” mindset) it doesn’t degrade me a bit. I suppose your admission that I am correct might make me just a teensy bit happy, but not as happy as wantonly spending gobs and gobs of cash. That may be pompous, but again, I didn’t say that straight people can’t do the same thing. My being a spendthrift is anecdotal, nothing more. I can’t claim to represent all the gays.
Incidentally, what I do find insulting is quoting me as saying “wrong and only an idiot would believe such a thing, and I have faith your not such an idiot.” I never typed anything so incoherent. (You’re, not your, by the way.)
check out this parody of OutsidePride.com
http://www.gayrightswatch.com/2006/08/outsidepridecoms-pos…
“I don’t know why you are getting so emotional about this, but please at least refrain from insults. If you want to talk about it more, visit my forum.”
“He” is getting so emotional because “he” is a queer… Along with insults, that’s what “they” do.
I buy Vuitton too… FOR MY WIFE! But please – don’t stop your silly, pathetic little rants; I receive great entertainment from your ridiculous, misinformed and misdirected drivel.
I bought my buffalo grass seed from the website with the best mixture I could find and the best price. Bought the buffalo, didn’t buy the bull. Sorry, but this simply is not my issue.