Zulkey agrees with the outrage over a giant breast gracing the cover of BabyTalk.
“Nobody should be forced to see something so disgusting and sexual. I prefer that the boobies on my magazine covers come the natural, Christian way. That is, kind of covered:”
Examples of the more acceptable ways to show breasts on magazine covers follow.
Consumers upset over the display of breasts on their free magazine have a variety of proactive options to choose, including from averting their eyes, writing letters of complaint, and moving to Afghanistan. After all, there’s no use crying over spilled milk.
More From Consumerist
-
Some Of Those Threats Weren’t Empty: 25% Of Instagram Users May Have Quit Over TOS
-
Hey, Verizon And Motorola, I Want My Ice Cream Sandwich
-
Find-And-Replace Is Not A Good Idea When Porting Kindle Texts To Nook
-
SiriusXM Takes Away Free Subscriptions From People Who Didn’t Win Them, Internet Is Outraged
-
Amazon Pulls SimCity 5 Downloads Amid Furor Over Constant Crashing & Slow Servers
Looks like an elbow to me.
Looks like a shampoo dispenser to me.
http://www.gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/breastshaped-shampo…
After I posted that on my site and wrote about the controversy some woman accused me of being a closet pedophile and said I should be served with a search warrant! For the record, I’m into aging intellectuals and my main interest in children is that they never cross my path.
I think that’s god’s boob.
But what do they feel about Adam’s cock hanging out when he’s touching God’s hand? Is that sexual?
My God, some people are stupid.
Adam’s cock is far too small to be sexual. It’s church cock, not porno cock.
So if Adam had a huge cock, then it’d be sexual?
I find it disturbing that we have a perfectly able and willing breast
to discuss, and yet the subject of cocks comes up. I appluad the effort
at trying to get by the overwhelming prudishness of the article, but
please — Stick to the beautiful breast. ;>
I dunno – I think I’d prefer to talk about the cock.
So where do these people get the whole idea of ‘this is sexual?’ Isn’t the entire process around making a baby sexual? I’m not seeing the line…
@ Papercutninja, I should probably clarify that my remarks were not both about your question. That people are stupid has to do with the notion that Amy Alkon’s a closet pedophile (and with oh, so many other things, but I’m sure that’s a given). As far as Adam’s cock is concerned, I was just being flip.
But while I’m at it, James, why can we talk freely about breasts but not cocks? Now we’re getting into a sexist area…
That’s not a boob, it’s lunch!
Jeez, some people.
Now, if Adam had an erect cock…
OK, now I’m going to hell.
if all the uptight christians are in heaven i think i’d prefer hell. i like it hot, i was raised in phoenix.
I’m not gay, but if adam was sprouting a rod, i’d have to look.